This paper investigates the effects of different automation design philosophies for a helicopter navigation task. A baseline navigation display is compared with two more advanced systems: an advisory display, which provides a discrete trajectory suggestion; and a constraint-based display, which provides information about the set of possible trajectory solutions. The results of a human-in-the-loop experiment with eight pilot participants show a significant negative impact of the advisory display on pilot trajectory decision-making: out of the 16 encountered off-nominal situations across the experiment, only 6 were solved optimally. The baseline and constraint-based display both lead to better decisions, with 14 out of 16 being optimal. However, pilots still preferred the advisory display, in particular in off-nominal situations. These results highlight that even when a support system is preferred by pilots, it can have strong inadvertent negative effects on their decision-making.

本文研究了不同自动化设计理念对直升机导航任务的影响。基线导航显示与两个更先进的系统进行了比较：咨询显示，提供离散的轨迹建议；以及基于约束的显示，它提供有关一组可能的轨迹解决方案的信息。8 名飞行员参与的人机交互实验结果表明，咨询显示对飞行员轨迹决策的负面影响显着：在整个实验中遇到的 16 次非标称情况中，只有 6 次得到了最佳解决. 基线和基于约束的显示都可以带来更好的决策，16 个中有 14 个是最佳的。然而，飞行员仍然更喜欢咨询显示，特别是在非标称情况下。