当前位置: X-MOL 学术Aerosp. Sci. Technol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Human-Automation Interaction for Helicopter Flight: Comparing Two Decision-Support Systems for Navigation Tasks
Aerospace Science and Technology ( IF 5.0 ) Pub Date : 2022-06-20 , DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107719
Daniel Friesen , Clark Borst , Marilena D. Pavel , Pierangelo Masarati , Max Mulder

This paper investigates the effects of different automation design philosophies for a helicopter navigation task. A baseline navigation display is compared with two more advanced systems: an advisory display, which provides a discrete trajectory suggestion; and a constraint-based display, which provides information about the set of possible trajectory solutions. The results of a human-in-the-loop experiment with eight pilot participants show a significant negative impact of the advisory display on pilot trajectory decision-making: out of the 16 encountered off-nominal situations across the experiment, only 6 were solved optimally. The baseline and constraint-based display both lead to better decisions, with 14 out of 16 being optimal. However, pilots still preferred the advisory display, in particular in off-nominal situations. These results highlight that even when a support system is preferred by pilots, it can have strong inadvertent negative effects on their decision-making.



中文翻译:

直升机飞行的人机交互:比较两种导航任务的决策支持系统

本文研究了不同自动化设计理念对直升机导航任务的影响。基线导航显示与两个更先进的系统进行了比较:咨询显示,提供离散的轨迹建议;以及基于约束的显示,它提供有关一组可能的轨迹解决方案的信息。8 名飞行员参与的人机交互实验结果表明,咨询显示对飞行员轨迹决策的负面影响显着:在整个实验中遇到的 16 次非标称情况中,只有 6 次得到了最佳解决. 基线和基于约束的显示都可以带来更好的决策,16 个中有 14 个是最佳的。然而,飞行员仍然更喜欢咨询显示,特别是在非标称情况下。

更新日期:2022-06-21
down
wechat
bug