This paper represents the third in a three-part series intended to challenge the social validity of the services provided by a university-based practicum for addressing the challenging behavior of individuals with disabilities. In this paper, we surveyed referring stakeholders (e.g., parents, teachers) of past service recipients to explore the acceptability of the service model's goals, methods, and outcomes. We probed for tensions resultant from the model's threefold mission (service, training, and research) and explored how conflicts between these goals affected the quality of our services. Generally, results were favorable and appeared to support continued model implementation, but not without qualification. Emergent themes, areas for improvement, and future directions for intervention research are all discussed.

中文翻译：

---

重新审视通过解决挑战性行为的大学实习提供的服务的社会有效性

本文代表了一个由三部分组成的系列文章中的第三篇，旨在挑战大学实习所提供的服务的社会有效性，以解决残疾人的挑战行为。在本文中，我们调查了过去服务接受者的相关利益相关者（例如，家长、教师），以探讨服务模式的目标、方法和结果的可接受性。我们探讨了该模型的三重使命（服务、培训和研究）导致的紧张关系，并探讨了这些目标之间的冲突如何影响我们的服务质量。总的来说，结果是有利的，似乎支持继续实施模型，但并非没有条件。对干预研究的新兴主题、改进领域和未来方向进行了讨论。