当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Interpersonal Violence › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Agreement Between Mother and Father Reports of IPV in a Sample of Child Protection Referred Coparents
Journal of Interpersonal Violence ( IF 2.6 ) Pub Date : 2022-06-08 , DOI: 10.1177/08862605221107055
Carla S. Stover 1 , Anahita Shafai 1 , Sharon J. Kwinjo 1 , Angela R. Farren 1 , Elizabeth Mazany 1 , Ciara J. McFaul 1
Affiliation  

Accurate assessment of intimate partner violence (IPV) using standardized measures can be a challenge as there is often discrepancy between partner reports, with previous research indicating very poor concordance between partners using the Conflict Tactics Scale. This study examines agreement between coparent reports of IPV using the Abusive Behavior Inventory (ABI) from 282 coparent dyads referred for Fathers for Change, an IPV intervention by the Department of Children and Families (DCF). Differences in partner concordance using intraclass correlations were examined based on type of violence, marital status/cohabitation, race/ethnicity and substance misuse problems. Intraclass correlations were also calculated for eight power and control items unique to the ABI. Overall agreement between coparents was poor. However, there was greater concordance about mothers’ who have used IPV toward fathers than fathers’ use of IPV toward mothers. There was lower agreement between reports of physical than psychological IPV especially for white coparents. All types of coparent relationships showed low levels of agreement, but cohabiting coparents showed the highest levels of agreement when reporting fathers’ IPV. In cases with one parent exhibiting substance misuse, concordance between reports of IPV increased. Results are consistent with prior findings that women report higher IPV than fathers even when assessments are done in the context of a DCF IPV treatment referral.



中文翻译:

在儿童保护被推荐的共同父母样本中,父母之间关于 IPV 报告的协议

使用标准化措施准确评估亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 可能是一项挑战,因为伴侣报告之间经常存在差异,之前的研究表明使用冲突策略量表的伴侣之间的一致性非常差。本研究使用来自 282 名为改变父亲而转介的共同父母的虐待行为清单 (ABI) 检验共同父母报告的 IPV 之间的一致性,这是儿童和家庭部 (DCF) 的一项 IPV 干预。根据暴力类型、婚姻状况/同居、种族/民族和药物滥用问题,使用组内相关性检查了伴侣一致性的差异。还计算了 ABI 独有的八个功率和控制项目的组内相关性。共同父母之间的总体协议很差。然而,母亲对父亲使用 IPV 的一致性高于父亲对母亲使用 IPV 的一致性。身体 IPV 报告之间的一致性低于心理 IPV,尤其是对于白人共同父母。在报告父亲的 IPV 时,所有类型的同居关系都表现出低水平的一致性,但同居的同居父母表现出最高水平的一致性。在一位家长表现出滥用药物的情况下,IPV 报告之间的一致性增加。结果与先前的发现一致,即女性报告的 IPV 高于父亲,即使在 DCF IPV 治疗转诊的情况下进行评估也是如此。在报告父亲的 IPV 时,所有类型的同居关系都表现出低水平的一致性,但同居的同居父母表现出最高水平的一致性。在一位家长表现出滥用药物的情况下,IPV 报告之间的一致性增加。结果与先前的发现一致,即女性报告的 IPV 高于父亲,即使在 DCF IPV 治疗转诊的情况下进行评估也是如此。在报告父亲的 IPV 时,所有类型的同居关系都表现出低水平的一致性,但同居的同居父母表现出最高水平的一致性。在一位家长表现出滥用药物的情况下,IPV 报告之间的一致性增加。结果与先前的发现一致,即女性报告的 IPV 高于父亲,即使在 DCF IPV 治疗转诊的情况下进行评估也是如此。

更新日期:2022-06-08
down
wechat
bug