Non- and sub-state climate action after Paris: From a facilitative regime to a contested governance landscape,WIREs Climate Change

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › WIREs Clim. Chang. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

Non- and sub-state climate action after Paris: From a facilitative regime to a contested governance landscape
WIREs Climate Change ( IF 9.4 ) Pub Date : 2022-06-15 , DOI: 10.1002/wcc.791
Jens Marquardt ₁ , Cornelia Fast ₂ , Julia Grimm ₃

Affiliation

The Paris Agreement marks a significant milestone in international climate politics. With its adoption, Parties call for non- and sub-state actors to contribute to the global climate agenda and close the emissions gap left by states. Such a facilitative setting embraces non-state climate action through joint efforts, synergies, and different modes of collaboration. At the same time, non-state actors have always played a critical and confrontational role in international climate governance. Based on a systematic literature review, we identify and critically assess the role of non-state climate action in a facilitative post-Paris climate governance regime. We thereby highlight three constitutive themes, namely different state-non-state relations, competing level of ambition, and a variety of knowledge foundations. We substantiate these themes, derived from an inductive analysis of existing literature, with illustrative examples and propose three paradigmatic non-state actor roles in post-Paris climate governance on a continuum between compliance and critique. We thereby highlight four particular threats of a facilitative setting, namely substitution of state action, co-optation, tokenism, and depoliticization. Future research should not limit itself to an effective integration of NSSAs into a facilitative climate regime, but also engage with the merits of contestation.

中文翻译：

巴黎之后的非国家和次国家气候行动：从促进机制到有争议的治理格局

《巴黎协定》标志着国际气候政治的一个重要里程碑。随着它的通过，缔约方呼吁非国家和次国家行为者为全球气候议程做出贡献，并缩小各国留下的排放差距。这种促进环境包括通过共同努力、协同作用和不同合作模式采取非国家气候行动。同时，非国家行为者在国际气候治理中一直扮演着批判性和对抗性的角色。基于系统的文献回顾，我们确定并批判性地评估了非国家气候行动在促进巴黎后气候治理制度中的作用。因此，我们强调了三个构成主题，即不同的国家与非国家关系、竞争的野心水平和各种知识基础。我们证实了这些主题，源自对现有文献的归纳分析，并附有说明性示例，并在合规和批评之间的连续统一体上提出了巴黎后气候治理中的三个范式非国家行为者角色。因此，我们强调了促进性环境的四个特定威胁，即替代国家行动、吸纳、象征主义和去政治化。未来的研究不应仅限于将 NSSA 有效整合到促进气候机制中，还应考虑争论的优点。合作、象征主义和非政治化。未来的研究不应仅限于将 NSSA 有效整合到促进气候机制中，还应考虑争论的优点。合作、象征主义和非政治化。未来的研究不应仅限于将 NSSA 有效整合到促进气候机制中，还应考虑争论的优点。

更新日期：2022-06-15

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

阅读更多本刊最新论文