Rescorla explores the relation between Reflection, Conditionalization, and Dutch book arguments in the presence of a weakened concept of sure loss and weakened conditions of self-transparency for doxastic agents. The literature about Reflection and about Dutch Book arguments, though overlapping, are distinct, and its history illuminates the import of Rescorla's investigation. With examples from a previous debate in the 70s and results about Reflection and Conditionalization in the 80s, I propose a way of seeing the epistemic enterprise in the light of practical requirements to be met by demands for synchronic coherence and probability updating policies. This includes a defense of principles rejected by Rescorla, while allowing for the value of his results in the borderland between theories of cognition and formal epistemology.

中文翻译：

---

反思与条件化：对 Michael Rescorla 的评论

雷斯科拉（Rescorla）探讨了反思、条件化和荷兰书籍论证之间的关系，其中存在着肯定损失的概念被弱化以及信念代理人的自我透明度被弱化的条件。关于《反思》和《荷兰书》论点的文献虽然有重叠，但却是截然不同的，其历史阐明了雷斯科拉调查的重要性。通过 70 年代先前辩论的例子以及 80 年代关于反思和条件化的结果，我提出了一种根据同步一致性和概率更新政策的要求来满足的实际要求来看待认知事业的方法。这包括对雷斯科拉所拒绝的原则的辩护，同时考虑到他的结果在认知理论和形式认识论之间的边界上的价值。