Group singing and music-making behaviors that were rapidly adapted to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic context suggest to Greenberg et al. (2021) not only a musical solution to pandemic-related social isolation but also the importance of the social neuroscientific side of music. They propose a model of the social neuroscience of music production premised on the view that group singing leads to increased levels of oxytocin (a neuropeptide associated with empathy and social bonding), citing data of Schladt et al. (2017) and Keeler et al. (2015) as support. The present commentary points out that Schladt et al. reported a decrease rather than an increase in oxytocin level following group singing. Further, reference to the work by Keeler et al. (2015) is only partially accurate, and evidence contrary to the oxytocin premise is ignored. Similar inaccuracy is associated with claims for cortisol, another primary component of their model. While the authors are applauded for directing attention to both the social neuroscience of music and the value of group singing, tempering the stated premises associated with the oxytocin and cortisol channels of the model is recommended.

中文翻译：

---

音乐制作的社会神经科学模型始于一个可疑的注释：Greenberg 等人的评论。（2021 年）。

迅速适应冠状病毒病 (COVID-19) 大流行背景的集体唱歌和音乐制作行为向 Greenberg 等人提出了建议。（2021）不仅是解决与流行病相关的社会孤立的音乐解决方案，而且还体现了音乐社会神经科学方面的重要性。他们提出了一个音乐制作的社会神经科学模型，其前提是集体唱歌会导致催产素（一种与移情和社会联系相关的神经肽）水平升高，并引用了 Schladt 等人的数据。（2017）和基勒等人。（2015）作为支持。本评论指出，Schladt 等人。据报道，集体唱歌后催产素水平下降而不是增加。此外，参考 Keeler 等人的工作。(2015) 仅部分准确，与催产素前提相反的证据被忽略。类似的不准确性与皮质醇的说法有关，皮质醇是他们模型的另一个主要组成部分。虽然作者因将注意力集中到音乐的社会神经科学和集体演唱的价值而受到称赞，但建议调整与模型的催产素和皮质醇通道相关的规定前提。