The earlier report needs to be considered with the following minor corrections in the text. It is noteworthy that the below-mentioned corrections are technical rather than scientific in nature. Thus, these corrections nowhere alter the scientific discussion/finding of the report and are for the sake of clarity of the discussion provided. Figure 2a–f should be considered with the x-axis (laser power) in the units of mW. The x-axis scale of Figure 2b,d,f should be considered as that provided in the updated Figure herein. Figure 2. Variation of the Raman shift and Raman line width as a function of incident laser power observed for 785 nm and 633 nm laser excitations, respectively, in (a and b) SmFe_0.5Cr_0.5O₃; (c and d) ErFe_0.5Cr_0.5O₃; (e and f) EuFe_0.5Cr_0.5O₃. This article has not yet been cited by other publications. Figure 2. Variation of the Raman shift and Raman line width as a function of incident laser power observed for 785 nm and 633 nm laser excitations, respectively, in (a and b) SmFe_0.5Cr_0.5O₃; (c and d) ErFe_0.5Cr_0.5O₃; (e and f) EuFe_0.5Cr_0.5O₃.

中文翻译：

---

更正“激光激发波长和功率在 RFe0.50Cr0.50O3（R = Sm、Er 和 Eu）中的 Fano 共振散射中的作用：简要拉曼研究”

需要考虑较早的报告，并在文本中进行以下较小的更正。值得注意的是，下面提到的更正本质上是技术性的，而不是科学性的。因此，这些更正不会改变报告的科学讨论/发现，并且是为了使所提供的讨论更加清晰。图 2a-f 应考虑以mW为单位的x轴（激光功率） 。图 2b、d、f的x轴比例应视为此处更新的图中提供的比例。_{图 2. 在 (a 和 b) SmFe 0.5} Cr _0.5 O中，分别在 785 nm 和 633 nm 激光激发下观察到的拉曼位移和拉曼线宽随入射激光功率的变化₃；(c和d) ErFe _0.5 Cr _0.5 O ₃；(e和f)EuFe _0.5 Cr _0.5 O ₃。这篇文章尚未被其他出版物引用。_{图 2. 在 (a 和 b) SmFe 0.5} Cr _0.5 O ₃中，分别在 785 nm 和 633 nm 激光激发下观察到的拉曼位移和拉曼线宽随入射激光功率的变化；(c和d) ErFe _0.5 Cr _0.5 O ₃；(e和f)EuFe _0.5 Cr _0.5 O ₃。