当前位置: X-MOL 学术Pacific Philosophical Quarterly › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Second Thoughts About My Favourite Theory
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly ( IF 0.7 ) Pub Date : 2022-06-09 , DOI: 10.1111/papq.12408
Johan E. Gustafsson 1, 2, 3
Affiliation  

A straightforward way to handle moral uncertainty is simply to follow the moral theory in which you have most credence. This approach is known as My Favourite Theory. In this paper, I argue that, in some cases, My Favourite Theory prescribes choices that are, sequentially, worse in expected moral value than the opposite choices according to each moral theory you have any credence in. In addition, this problem generalizes to other approaches that avoid intertheoretic comparisons of value, such as My Favourite Option, the Borda Rule, Variance Normalization and the Principle of Maximizing Expected Normalized Moral Value.

中文翻译:

关于我最喜欢的理论的第二个想法

处理道德不确定性的直接方法就是遵循您最信任的道德理论。这种方法被称为我最喜欢的理论。在本文中,我认为,在某些情况下,我最喜欢的理论规定的选择在预期道德价值上比你所相信的每一种道德理论的相反选择更差。此外,这个问题推广到其他避免理论间价值比较的方法,例如我最喜欢的选项、Borda 规则、方差归一化和最大化预期归一化道德价值的原则。
更新日期:2022-06-09
down
wechat
bug