This article discusses how the work of Luigi Snozzi in the village of Monte Carasso in Switzerland is relevant for the investigation of the relationship between rules and architectural form. It describes the work of Snozzi both as a nomothete and as a designer across thirty years, arguing that the impact of his code and that of harchitectural designs on the village are not separable. While Snozzi’s code for Monte Carasso, as reported in various publications and talks, builds on a series of indeterminacies that can potentially undermine its effectiveness, the architect’s own designs, such as the Guidotti House, act as models for the interpretation of the normative reach of the code. This article traces the indeterminacy of Snozzi's code, building on concepts borrowed from social ontology and philosophy of law, to describe how rules can contribute, in this case study, to determine architectural quality. In particular, the article questions the nature of the norms enacted in Monte Carasso to suggest that the unmediated application of building codes can lead to unfavourable architectural outcomes. It argues that, when considered as normative models, architectural projects can facilitate a more effective application of the ideas underlying the normative scope of architectural regulations.

中文翻译：

---

建筑师作为 nomothete：Monte Carasso 的 Luigi Snozzi

本文讨论了 Luigi Snozzi 在瑞士蒙特卡拉索村的工作如何与规则与建筑形式之间关系的调查相关。它描述了 Snozzi 作为一个 nomothete 和一个设计师跨越 30 年的工作，认为他的代码和村庄的建筑设计的影响是不可分割的。虽然 Snozzi 的 Monte Carasso 代码，正如在各种出版物和演讲中所报道的那样，建立在一系列可能会破坏其有效性的不确定性之上，但建筑师自己的设计，例如 Guidotti House，充当了解释规范范围的模型。编码。本文追溯了斯诺齐法典的不确定性，建立在从社会本体论和法律哲学中借用的概念之上，在本案例研究中，描述规则如何有助于确定架构质量。特别是，该文章质疑蒙特卡拉索制定的规范的性质，以表明建筑规范的无中介应用可能导致不利的建筑结果。它认为，当被视为规范模型时，建筑项目可以促进更有效地应用建筑法规规范范围内的思想。