Abstract

This paper focuses on how sometimes it is possible to encounter nodal concepts that seem to lead to a perceptible consistency of the intertwining of some “fil rouge” in the theories and sensibilities of psychoanalysts who are otherwise very different from each other. Ninety years after the last conferences held by Ferenczi in America, it emerges that Ferenczi remains a point of reference for numerous authors and continues to influence many of the theories proposed. In particular, the concept of agency, as theorized by Jonathan Slavin, would seem capable of organizing a series of observations in analytic practice within a coherent theoretical framework, while remaining unsaturated enough to allow further reflections and connections with the theories of other scholars, among which that of Edgar Levenson appears significant. Levenson and Slavin, in the wake of Ferenczi, highlight how the analyst must avoid both the risk of an aseptic neutrality and the risk of collusion with their own narcissistic desire at the expense of the desire of others, since the realization of these risks would hinder the patient from becoming an agent of themself.

摘要

本文侧重于有时如何可能遇到节点概念，这些节点概念似乎导致在理论和情感分析中相互交织的一些“fil rouge”的可感知的一致性，这些分析学家在其他方面彼此截然不同。在 Ferenczi 在美国举行的最后一次会议 90 年后，Ferenczi 仍然是众多作者的参考点，并继续影响许多提出的理论。特别是，代理的概念，正如乔纳森·斯莱文 (Jonathan Slavin) 所理论化的那样，似乎能够在连贯的理论框架内组织分析实践中的一系列观察，同时保持足够的不饱和度，以允许进一步反思和与其他学者的理论联系起来，包括Edgar Levenson 的观点显得很重要。利文森和斯莱文，