当前位置: X-MOL 学术Archaeological Dialogues › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Degrowth, anti-capitalism or post-archaeology? A response to Nicolas Zorzin
Archaeological Dialogues ( IF 1.4 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-12 , DOI: 10.1017/s1380203821000052
LouAnn Wurst

1 When employed by Oxford Archaeological Unit (now Oxford Archaeology) on the Swindon–Gloucester road scheme (1996) we were required to sign a disclaimer against road protests. This was after the Newbury bypass and M3 Winchester protests where archaeologists had been active dissenting voices. Now we found ourselves working for the road builders, who did not consider this dichotomy to be appropriate. 2 See https://blacktrowelcollective.wordpress.com. 3 See www.mola.org.uk/archaeology-and-public-benefit-ukri-future-leaders-fellowship.

中文翻译:

退化、反资本主义或后考古?对尼古拉斯·佐津的回应

1 当受雇于牛津考古部门(现为牛津考古)参与 Swindon-Gloucester 道路计划(1996 年)时,我们被要求签署一份反对道路抗议的免责声明。这是在纽伯里绕道和 M3 温彻斯特抗议活动之后,考古学家一直在积极反对声音。现在我们发现自己为道路建设者工作,他们认为这种二分法不合适。2 请参阅 https://blacktrowelcollective.wordpress.com。3 见 www.mola.org.uk/archaeology-and-public-benefit-ukri-future-leaders-fellowship。
更新日期:2021-05-12
down
wechat
bug