Abstract Discrimination by charities raises questions about the appropriate extent of equality regulation and has implications for government outsourcing through charities and for the provision of tax concessions. Professor Parachin has recently provided a justification for denying the application of public equality norms to charities through the public policy test of charity law. This paper builds on that work by considering whether liberal societies might, however, have good grounds to apply public equality norms to charities in circumstances such as the provision of outsourced government services, state enforcement of egoistic giving, or where doing so is a proportionate means to prevent harm.

中文翻译：

---

慈善与歧视：慈善法总是比公共政策更好的解决方案吗？

摘要 慈善机构的歧视引发了关于平等监管适当程度的问题，并对通过慈善机构进行政府外包和提供税收优惠产生影响。Parachin 教授最近通过慈善法的公共政策测试为拒绝将公共平等规范应用于慈善机构提供了一个理由。本文以这项工作为基础，考虑了自由社会是否有充分的理由将公共平等规范应用于慈善机构，例如提供外包政府服务、国家强​​制执行利己主义捐赠，或者这样做是一种相称的手段以防止伤害。