The current qualitative and quantitative study methods intend to investigate the quality of electronic examinations and the obstacles of changing the examinations’ process from the participants’ experiences and perspectives. The study generates feedback to enhance the adoption and improvement of the e. examination process. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, electronic exams help much during the education interruption. The study employed two tools to answer the study’scentraln question: “To what extent did teachers and students reflect on the quality of electronic examinations’ criteria? They Were distributed among (n=165) undergraduates and (n=24) faculty members during 2020/2021. Findings from the e. questionnaire’s SPSS and interview’s content analyses indicated that most participants were satisfied with the e. exams’ flexibility, ease of use, clarity, fairness in grading, and feasibility in time, efforts, and money. Concerning challenges, few undergraduates complained about the Network problems, e. cheating, and the number of attempts to answer e. exams. Few faculty members have complained that some questions require different preparation methods, e. exams increase students’ scores without much effort. On the other hand, it opened the door for malpractices. To conclude, the results revealed that E. examinations are of high quality; they were responsible for undergraduates’ high performance, saved effort and time more than the in-class exams. The study recommends future research exploring families, especially parents, about their experience with kids regarding the quality of online examinations during the COVID- 19 pandemic. Moreover, research is needed to address how teachers deal with the validity and reliability of the electronic exams

中文翻译：

---

从教师和学生的经验和角度考察电子考试的质量

当前的定性和定量研究方法旨在从参与者的经验和角度调查电子考试的质量和改变考试过程的障碍。该研究产生反馈，以加强对 e. 的采用和改进。考试过程。由于 COVID-19 大流行，电子考试在教育中断期间有很大帮助。该研究采用了两种工具来回答研究的中心问题：“教师和学生在多大程度上反映了电子考试标准的质量？他们在 2020/2021 年期间分布在 (n=165) 本科生和 (n=24) 教职员工中。来自 e 的调查结果。问卷的 SPSS 和访谈的内容分析表明，大多数参与者对 e. 考试的灵活性，易用性，分级的清晰度、公平性以及时间、努力和金钱的可行性。关于挑战，很少有本科生抱怨网络问题，例如。作弊，以及尝试回答的次数 e。考试。很少有教员抱怨某些问题需要不同的准备方法，例如。考试不费吹灰之力就能提高学生的分数。另一方面，它为不当行为打开了大门。总而言之，结果表明 E. 考试质量很高；与课堂考试相比，他们对本科生的高表现、节省的精力和时间负责。该研究建议未来的研究探索家庭，尤其是父母，了解他们在 COVID-19 大流行期间与孩子有关在线考试质量的经历。而且，