当前位置: X-MOL 学术Methodology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Does rapid guessing prevent the detection of the effect of a time limit in testing?
Methodology ( IF 1.975 ) Pub Date : 2021-09-30 , DOI: 10.5964/meth.4663
Karl Schweizer , Dorothea Krampen , Brian F. French

Rapid guessing is a test taking strategy recommended for increasing the probability of achieving a high score if a time limit prevents an examinee from responding to all items of a scale. The strategy requires responding quickly and without cognitively processing item details. Although there may be no omitted responses after participants' rapid guessing, an open question remains: do the data show unidimensionality, as is expected for data collected by a scale, or bi-dimensionality characterizing data collected with a time limit in testing, speeded data. To answer this question, we simulated speeded and rapid guessing data and performed confirmatory factor analysis using one-factor and two-factor models. The results revealed that speededness was detectable despite the presence of rapid guessing. However, detection may depend on the number of response options for a given set of items.

中文翻译:

快速猜测是否会阻止检测时间限制对测试的影响?

快速猜测是一种推荐的考试策略,用于在时间限制阻止考生回答量表的所有项目时增加获得高分的概率。该策略需要快速响应且无需认知处理项目细节。尽管在参与者快速猜测后可能没有遗漏的回答,但一个悬而未决的问题仍然存在:数据是否显示出单维性,正如通过量表收集的数据所预期的那样,或者是在测试中有时间限制的情况下收集的二维表征数据,加速数据. 为了回答这个问题,我们模拟了快速和快速的猜测数据,并使用单因素和双因素模型进行了验证性因素分析。结果表明,尽管存在快速猜测,但可以检测到速度。然而,
更新日期:2021-09-30
down
wechat
bug