Abstract. The authentic and hubristic pride (A&HP) model is the domineering paradigm in pride research. Authentic pride (AP) comprises feelings of accomplishment and self-worth, whereas hubristic pride (HP) includes conceit and arrogance. We provide a German version of the A&HP scale ( Tracy & Robins, 2007 ), the GAHPS. We found a good fit for a two-factor solution. Internal consistencies were high. Nomological validity was supported for personality, self-esteem, and narcissism (Study 1, N = 569), status (Study 2, N = 565), and other emotions (Study 3, N = 204). In Study 4 ( N = 184), AP and HP had different associations with prosocial and antisocial behavior. We found high self-other agreement (109 dyads) for AP but not for HP. Further, people used different words to describe AP and HP when they described themselves and peers, thus suggesting that the two forms are associated with different linguistic styles. Finally, using an Ant Colony Optimization algorithm, we derived a short form for the scale. Researchers are advised to choose the standard or short scale, depending on the research purpose. This research broadens the validity testing of the A&HP model and, for the first time, provides linguistic correlates of the two forms of pride.

中文翻译：

---

德国标准和简短的真实和狂妄的自豪感量表

摘要。真实傲慢的自豪感（A&HP）模型是自豪感研究中的霸道范式。真实的自豪感（AP）包括成就感和自我价值感，而傲慢的自豪感（HP）包括自负和傲慢。我们提供德国版的 A&HP 量表 (Tracy & Robins, 2007)，即 GAHPS。我们找到了一个非常适合双因素解决方案的方案。内部一致性很高。人格、自尊和自恋（研究 1，N = 569）、地位（研究 2，N = 565）和其他情绪（研究 3，N = 204）支持法则效度。在研究 4 (N = 184) 中，AP 和 HP 与亲社会和反社会行为有不同的关联。我们发现 AP 的自我其他一致性很高（109 对），但 HP 没有。此外，人们在描述自己和同龄人时使用不同的词来描述 AP 和 HP，因此表明这两种形式与不同的语言风格有关。最后，使用蚁群优化算法，我们推导出了规模的简写形式。建议研究人员根据研究目的选择标准量表或短量表。这项研究拓宽了 A&HP 模型的有效性测试，并首次提供了两种形式的自豪感的语言相关性。