当前位置：
X-MOL 学术
›
The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Book Review: Himmlisch! Die Eisenobjekte aus dem Grab des Tutanchamun
The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-01 , DOI: 10.1177/03075133211043888 Martin Odler 1
The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-01 , DOI: 10.1177/03075133211043888 Martin Odler 1
Affiliation
The never-ending stream of new publications means that some important ones get unnoticed. This slender and elegant volume brings together the most complete published data on the iron artefacts from the burial equipment of King Tutankhamun (Tomb KV 62). It was not cited in the latest discussion of the ancient Egyptian iron in the JEA, therefore it is necessary to raise awareness about this book and stress its importance for the research of Egyptian ironwork and metallurgy. The book is a by-product of a thorough study of golden appliqués from the Tomb of Tutankhamun, being a cooperation of the German Archaeological Institute in Cairo, the University of Tübingen, the Egyptian Museum in Cairo and the Roman-Germanic Central Museum in Mainz. The text succinctly describes the sixteen model chisels with iron blades, found in a wooden box (Carter No. 16); an iron wedjat-eye amulet on a golden armlet (Carter No. 256hh[1] and 256hh[3]); an iron amulet in the form of a headrest (Carter No. 256,4,v); and the most famous object, a dagger with an iron blade (Carter No. 256k). The main focus is on this last artefact, taking one fifth of the length of the volume. The highly informative text is accompanied by superb photographs and radiographs of the complete artefacts, technological details documented by macro-photographs and photographs from a microscope. What is discussed in the text is at the same time visible in the photographs, and that is not the case for each publication of archaeological material. It provides a model example of how scientific data can be presented in a visually appealing way, in a ‘popular’-leaning publication, nevertheless based on thorough scientific data. In addition to the documentation of artefacts, all objects were analysed by portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF), compared with the measurements of a selection of the iron meteorites (pp. 24–8). A previous publication of the Egyptian-Italian team focused only on the dagger blade, in this book all objects are demonstrated as being most probably made of meteoritic iron. It is true that Egyptologists assumed this for decades, but now the assumption is corroborated by analytical data. After the discussion of the iron objects, another dagger from the Tomb of Tutankhamun (Carter No. 256dd) is thoroughly examined, and the pXRF analysis of its gold is adduced as well. The text builds a case for the dagger with the iron blade being a ‘smaller brother’ (p. 43) of the fully golden dagger; a product of artists or groups of artists with different sets of skills, with the latter, golden dagger being a product of a much more skilled artisan(s). These could have been members of the same workshop, although this seems improbable. Direct comparison of the detailed photographs of both daggers side by side in full colour are revealing, and it is clear that 256dd serves as an inspiration for the 256k. The authors close with the possibility that blades, hilts, and sheaths could have been made at separate times and places in the Late Bronze Age (p. 44). There are archaeometallurgical techniques that could provide further clarity, but they are not currently available in Egypt. The décor of the iron dagger tries to imitate or directly cite the golden one, thus the suggestion of mutually independent creation seems to be improbable as well. The author of this review has only very few critical remarks. A scale is absent from all photographs, with the exception of microscopic photography. Adding one
更新日期：2021-06-01
京公网安备 11010802027423号