Criminal justice is afflicted with enforcement swamping crises. Is a bigger criminal justice system the only answer? Are there better ways to scale up prevention and justice? Literatures on four system-capacity crises, selected for how different they are, show that there are collective efficacy strategies that can move from institution to institution to scale up justice and prevention. Substance abuse, corporate crime, war crime, and gendered violence are problems that the criminal justice system pretends to solve but barely touches. To subdue system-capacity crises, community participation in crime control must grow to become more than just an adjunct to state enforcement and in a way that transforms democratic citizenship. Gifts of scaled-up volunteerism are needed, but institutional responsibility for collective efficacy is more critical than individualized responsibility for self-efficacy. To tackle system capacity deficits, businesses, armies, schools, and social movements that include feminism, LGBTIQ rights, Indigenous rights, environmentalism, and restorative justice can be empowered to mobilize collective efficacy for domination reduction. A long march through societies’ institutions led by such movements can achieve macro transformation in the scale of justice and prevention. Concrete collective efficacy strategies can be developed.

中文翻译：

---

扩大犯罪预防和司法

刑事司法受到执法淹没危机的困扰。更大的刑事司法系统是唯一的答案吗？有没有更好的方法来扩大预防和正义？关于四种系统能力危机的文献，根据它们的不同之处进行选择，表明存在可以从一个机构转移到另一个机构的集体效能策略，以扩大正义和预防。药物滥用、公司犯罪、战争犯罪和性别暴力是刑事司法系统假装要解决但几乎没有触及的问题。为了缓和系统能力危机，社区参与犯罪控制必须发展成为不仅仅是国家执法的辅助手段，而且以一种转变民主公民身份的方式。需要扩大志愿服务的礼物，但集体效能的机构责任比自我效能的个人责任更重要。为了解决系统能力不足，企业、军队、学校和包括女权主义、LGBTIQ 权利、原住民权利、环保主义和恢复性正义在内的社会运动可以被授权动员集体效能来减少统治。在这些运动的领导下，通过社会机构的长征可以实现司法和预防规模的宏观转变。可以制定具体的集体效能战略。恢复性司法可以被赋权以动员集体效能来减少统治。在这些运动的领导下，通过社会机构的长征可以实现司法和预防规模的宏观转变。可以制定具体的集体效能战略。恢复性司法可以被赋权以动员集体效能来减少统治。在这些运动的领导下，通过社会机构的长征可以实现司法和预防规模的宏观转变。可以制定具体的集体效能战略。