OBJECTIVE Hybrid teleneuropsychology has emerged as a useful assessment method to manage physical distancing requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic. We describe the development of a hybrid teleneuropsychology clinic and compare results of six neuropsychological tasks across testing modalities, as well as a participant experience survey. METHOD Healthy middle-aged and older adults completed a face-to-face assessment two years previously. Participants either completed reassessment face-to-face or via the hybrid setup. Results were compared across time points and delivery modality. RESULTS There were no significant differences in scores at reassessment between face-to-face and a hybrid setup on nonverbal fluid intelligence, verbal memory, visual memory, language, working memory or verbal initiation. Retest reliability was moderate to excellent for verbal and visual memory, attention and naming. Results of an anonymous survey indicated that participants felt comfortable and established good rapport with the examiner. CONCLUSIONS This hybrid method of teleneuropsychology can be used to obtain high quality and reliable results including on tasks yet to be evaluated for teleneuropsychology, including the Graded Naming Test and the Topographical Recognition Memory Test.

中文翻译：

---

在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施混合远程神经心理学方法评估中老年人。

目标 混合​​远程神经心理学已成为一种有用的评估方法，用于管理 COVID-19 大流行期间的物理距离要求。我们描述了混合远程神经心理学诊所的发展，并比较了六项神经心理学任务在测试模式中的结果，以及参与者体验调查。方法 健康的中年人和老年人在两年前完成了一次面对面的评估。参与者要么完成面对面的重新评估，要么通过混合设置完成。比较不同时间点和交付方式的结果。结果 面对面和混合设置在非语言流体智力、语言记忆、视觉记忆、语言、工作记忆或语言启动方面的重新评估分数没有显着差异。口头和视觉记忆、注意力和命名的重测可靠性为中等至优秀。一项匿名调查的结果表明，参与者感到自在并与考官建立了良好的关系。结论 这种远程神经心理学的混合方法可用于获得高质量和可靠的结果，包括尚未对远程神经心理学进行评估的任务，包括分级命名测试和地形识别记忆测试。