Introduction: In recent years, practice friendly models of suicidal behavior have emerged in the form of “ideation-to-action” frameworks. These frameworks focus on processes influencing both the formation of suicidal ideation and the translation of that ideation to suicide attempt and death. In this paper, we proffer an emerging model of suicide, Preferences in Information Processing (PIP), to augment contemporary suicide theories. First, we provide a primer on dual-process models of information processing theory and research as the foundation for the PIP. Next, drawing on a number of initial cross-sectional studies, we outline a rationale and examples of how preferences in motivated affect (i.e., Need for Affect) and cognition (i.e., Need for Cognition) may be integrated into existing ideation-to-action frameworks. Methods: We conducted secondary analysis of our pooled community sample PIP data. Results: We present new findings suggesting Need for Affect avoidance and Need for Cognition may be clinically relevant for persons at escalated risk for suicide. Discussion: The PIP offers new testable propositions within ideation-to-action suicide frameworks. We end with recommendations for a research agenda to further investigate the potential validation and utility of a PIP approach to suicidology.

中文翻译：

---

证明自杀信息处理模型的偏好

简介：近年来，以“想法到行动”框架的形式出现了对实践友好的自杀行为模型。这些框架侧重于影响自杀意念形成以及该意念转化为自杀未遂和死亡的过程。在本文中，我们提出了一种新兴的自杀模型，即信息处理偏好 (PIP)，以增强当代自杀理论。首先，我们提供了关于信息处理理论和研究的双过程模型的入门知识，作为 PIP 的基础。接下来，利用一些初步的横断面研究，我们概述了动机性情感（即情感需求）和认知（即认知需求）中的偏好如何整合到现有的构想中的基本原理和示例。行动框架。方法：我们对汇集的社区样本 PIP 数据进行了二次分析。结果：我们提出的新发现表明，避免影响的需要和认知的需要可能与自杀风险升高的人具有临床相关性。讨论：PIP 在想法到行动的自杀框架内提供了新的可测试命题。我们以研究议程的建议结束，以进一步研究 PIP 方法对自杀学的潜在验证和效用。