In the last years, the idea of using natural elements or nature-based solutions (NbS) to mitigate the impacts of cities on climate, biodiversity and citizens' health became more popular in research and practice. Nevertheless, there are currently uncertainties in finding and selecting appropriate criteria and indicators for monitoring and evaluating the impact and performance of NbS and its co-creation processes. This paper proposes an easy-to-use and structured procedure for selecting appropriate criteria and indicators for monitoring and evaluating any kind of NbS project. The user is guided step by step in selecting meaningful metrics. The procedure is tested using a real case study from the Horizon 2020 research project CLEVER Cities as an example. The test shows that by following the indicated procedure, the criteria and indicator selection process is speeded up and reproducible.

在过去的几年里，使用自然元素或基于自然的解决方案 (NbS) 来减轻城市对气候、生物多样性和公民健康的影响的想法在研究和实践中变得越来越流行。然而，目前在寻找和选择适当的标准和指标来监测和评估 NbS 及其共同创造过程的影响和绩效方面存在不确定性。本文提出了一种易于使用且结构化的程序，用于选择适当的标准和指标来监控和评估任何类型的 NbS 项目。引导用户逐步选择有意义的指标。以 Horizo​​n 2020 研究项目 CLEVER Cities 中的真实案例研究为例，对该程序进行了测试。测试表明，按照指示的程序，