Abstract. The until that time rather abstract debate about sustainable development has been focused by introducing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015 and the related European Green Deal in 2019. Restricting attention to agriculture, proposed targets and indicators are, however, not specific enough to allow a focus for developing innovative and sustainable management practices. Clarity is needed because farmers are suspicious of Governmental actions defining environmental rules and regulations. The European policy arena has recognized this problem and has presented the Mission concept that requires joint learning between farmers, scientists and citizens. For the soil Mission, “Living Labs” are proposed that should evolve into: “Lighthouses” when environmental thresholds for each of at least six land-related ecosystem services,are met. This presents “wicked” problems that can be “tamed” by measuring ecosystem services in a given :”Living Lab” that are associated with the land-related SDGs. Thresholds with a regional character are needed to seperate the “good” from the “not good enough”. Contributions by the soil to ecosystem services can be expressed by assessing soil health. By introducing the Mission concept, the policy arena challenges the research community to rise to the occasion by developing effective interaction models with farmers and citizens that can be the foundation for innovative and effective environmental rules and regulations. We argue and illustrate with a specific example, that establishing :”:Living Labs” can be an important, if not essential, contribution to realizing the lofty goals of the SDGs and the Green Deal.

中文翻译：

---

将“生活实验室”转变为：“灯塔”：实现与土地相关的可持续发展的有前景的政策？

摘要。直到那时，关于可持续发展的相当抽象的辩论一直集中在 2015 年引入联合国可持续发展目标 (SDG) 和 2019 年相关的欧洲绿色协议。然而，限制对农业的关注，提出的目标和指标并不具体足以让人们专注于开发创新和可持续的管理实践。需要澄清是因为农民对政府制定环境规则和法规的行为持怀疑态度。欧洲政策领域已经认识到这个问题，并提出了要求农民、科学家和公民共同学习的使命概念。对于土壤任务，建议“生活实验室”应演变为： 当至少六种与土地相关的生态系统服务中的每一种的环境阈值时，“灯塔”，被满足。这提出了可以通过测量与土地相关的可持续发展目标相关的给定“生活实验室”中的生态系统服务来“驯服”的“邪恶”问题。需要具有区域特征的阈值来区分“好”和“不够好”。土壤对生态系统服务的贡献可以通过评估土壤健康来表达。通过引入使命概念，政策领域通过开发与农民和公民的有效互动模型来挑战研究界，以应对这种情况，这可以成为创新和有效的环境规则和法规的基础。我们用一个具体的例子来论证和说明，建立:“:Living Labs”对于实现可持续发展目标和绿色协议的崇高目标可能是一个重要的，即使不是必不可少的贡献。这提出了可以通过测量与土地相关的可持续发展目标相关的给定“生活实验室”中的生态系统服务来“驯服”的“邪恶”问题。需要具有区域特征的阈值来区分“好”和“不够好”。土壤对生态系统服务的贡献可以通过评估土壤健康来表达。通过引入使命概念，政策领域通过开发与农民和公民的有效互动模型来挑战研究界，以应对这种情况，这可以成为创新和有效的环境规则和法规的基础。我们用一个具体的例子来论证和说明，建立:“:Living Labs”对于实现可持续发展目标和绿色协议的崇高目标可能是一个重要的，即使不是必不可少的贡献。这提出了可以通过测量与土地相关的可持续发展目标相关的给定“生活实验室”中的生态系统服务来“驯服”的“邪恶”问题。需要具有区域特征的阈值来区分“好”和“不够好”。土壤对生态系统服务的贡献可以通过评估土壤健康来表达。通过引入使命概念，政策领域通过开发与农民和公民的有效互动模型来挑战研究界，以应对这种情况，这可以成为创新和有效的环境规则和法规的基础。我们用一个具体的例子来论证和说明，建立:“:Living Labs”对于实现可持续发展目标和绿色协议的崇高目标可能是一个重要的，即使不是必不可少的贡献。