How often have you read the second part of a two-part article? For 25 years, I contended myself to read and reread Part I of the dissipativity article, thinking that this was the noble part of the theory [1]. Part II was just there to connect the new concept to the existing body of linear-quadratic theory [2]. My interest was in the nonlinear theory and in the future anyway, so why bother?

中文翻译：

---

50 年的耗散性，第二部分 [来自编辑]


您多久阅读一次由两部分组成的文章的第二部分？ 25 年来，我一直坚持阅读并重读耗散性文章的第一部分，认为这是该理论的崇高部分[1] 。第二部分只是将新概念与现有的线性二次理论联系起来[2] 。我的兴趣在于非线性理论以及未来，所以为什么要费心呢？