Aims: Child maltreatment (CM) is a global public health and social problem, resulting in serious long-term health and socioeconomic consequences. As parents are the most common perpetrators of CM, parenting interventions are appropriate strategies to prevent CM. However, research on parenting interventions on CM has been hampered by lack of consensus on what measures are most responsive to detect a reduction in parental maltreating behaviours after parenting intervention. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the responsiveness of all current parent- or caregiver-reported CM measures. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in CINAHL, Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO, PubMed and Sociological Abstracts. The quality of studies and responsiveness of the measures were evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Only measures developed and published in English were included. Studies reporting data on responsiveness of the included measures were selected. Results: Sixty-nine articles reported on responsiveness of 15 identified measures. The study quality was overall adequate. The responsiveness of the measures was overall insufficient or not reported; high-quality evidence on responsiveness was limited. Conclusions: Only the Physical Abuse subscale of the ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool for use in Trials (ICAST-Trial) can be recommended as most responsive for use in parenting interventions, with high-quality evidence supporting sufficient responsiveness. All other overall scales or subscales of the 15 included measures were identified as promising based on current data on responsiveness. Additional psychometric evidence is required before they can be recommended.

目的：虐待儿童 (CM) 是一个全球公共卫生和社会问题，会导致严重的长期健康和社会经济后果。由于父母是 CM 最常见的肇事者，育儿干预是预防 CM 的适当策略。然而，对 CM 的养育干预研究一直受到阻碍，因为缺乏对在养育干预后哪些措施对检测父母虐待行为的减少最有效的共识缺乏共识。该系统评价旨在评估所有当前父母或看护人报告的 CM 措施的响应性。方法：在 CINAHL、Embase、ERIC、PsycINFO、PubMed 和社会学文摘中进行了系统搜索。使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准 (COSMIN) 指南评估研究的质量和测量的响应性，以对患者报告的结果测量进行系统评价。仅包括以英文开发和发布的措施。选择了报告所包含措施的响应性数据的研究。结果： 69 篇文章报告了 15 项已确定措施的响应性。研究质量总体上是合格的。措施的响应性总体上不充分或未报告；关于反应性的高质量证据有限。结论：只有用于试验的 ISPCAN 儿童虐待筛查工具 (ICAST-Trial) 的身体虐待分量表才能被推荐为对用于育儿干预最敏感的量表，并且有高质量的证据支持足够的反应性。根据当前有关响应性的数据，所有其他总体量表或包含的 15 个子量表都被确定为有希望的。需要额外的心理测量证据才能被推荐。