An academic usually has a curriculum vitae (CV) or CV summary (resumé) that highlights their professional career paths. CVs contain information which is written by the academic to signal their qualifications and academic achievements to employers, granting agencies, or promotion and tenure committees. Decision makers face numerous problems with CVs as a vehicle that carries important information, including incomplete, outdated, biased, private, as well as falsified and fabricated information. To complicate matters, decision makers themselves could be making biased decisions even when CV information is complete and accurate due to potential discriminatory practices. There is weak consistency or standardization in implementation internationally, and little verification. This paper proposes a set of guidelines for verifiable, accurate, complete, updated, and public (VACUP guidelines) CVs, whether these be private, institutional, or owned by third parties. For the effective implementation of these guidelines, a new market in which a third party certifies the CV as VACUP-compliant, is recommended.

中文翻译：

---

简历：挑战和潜在解决方案

学者通常有一份简历（CV）或简历摘要（ressumé），以突出他们的职业道路。简历包含由学术撰写的信息，用于向雇主、资助机构或晋升和任期委员会表明他们的资格和学术成就。决策者在将简历作为携带重要信息的工具时面临许多问题，包括不完整、过时、有偏见、私人以及伪造和捏造的信息。更复杂的是，即使由于潜在的歧视性做法，简历信息完整且准确，决策者自己也可能做出有偏见的决定。国际上实施的一致性或标准化程度较弱，验证较少。本文提出了一套可验证的、准确的、完整的、更新的和公开的（VACUP 指南）简历，无论是私人的、机构的还是由第三方拥有。为了有效实施这些指导方针，建议使用第三方认证 CV 符合 VACUP 的新市场。