After one year of the Law of Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy in Chile, the possibility of aborting in three specific situations is recognized and professional support is given to the women who invoke it. Reflections are raised about its application in the causes described in it. Human dignity is placed as the central axis of the interpretation of the fetusmaternal reality. The meaning of the medical-perinatal act is discussed in the context of the preservation of the human species. The application of the principle of double effect and that of the only possible good in the discernment of the first causal is explained. In the second case, the influence of technology in fetal anamorphosis is discussed, together with the vulnerability and self-referential maternal focus in the malformed fetus. In the third case, we try to apply the notion of how violence cannot justify itself and we need to mediate consensus so as not to focus on the fetus as the cause of the harm. The aim is to warn about the risk of alienation of health professionals before the meaning of the dignity of the human being.

中文翻译：

---

智利 embarazo 自愿中断之道的思考“contractuales”acerca

在智利实施《自愿中断妊娠法》一年后，承认在三种特定情况下堕胎的可能性，并为援引该法的妇女提供专业支持。人们对其在其中描述的原因中的应用提出了反思。人的尊严被置于解释母性现实的中心轴。在人类物种保护的背景下讨论了围产期医疗行为的含义。解释了双效原理和唯一可能善的原理在辨别第一因果中的应用。在第二种情况下，讨论了技术对胎儿畸形的影响，以及畸形胎儿的脆弱性和自我参照母体焦点。在第三种情况下，我们试图应用暴力无法为自己辩护的概念，我们需要调解共识，以免将胎儿视为造成伤害的原因。其目的是在人类尊严的含义之前警告卫生专业人员疏远的风险。