当前位置: X-MOL 学术JAMA › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Screening for Impaired Visual Acuity in Older Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
JAMA ( IF 63.1 ) Pub Date : 2022-06-07 , DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.7015
, Carol M Mangione 1 , Michael J Barry 2 , Wanda K Nicholson 3 , Michael Cabana 4 , David Chelmow 5 , Tumaini Rucker Coker 6 , Esa M Davis 7 , Katrina E Donahue 3 , John W Epling 8 , Carlos Roberto Jaén 9 , Alex H Krist 5, 10 , Martha Kubik 11 , Li Li 12 , Gbenga Ogedegbe 13 , Lori Pbert 14 , John M Ruiz 15 , Melissa A Simon 16 , James Stevermer 17 , John B Wong 18
Affiliation  

Importance Impairment of visual acuity is a serious public health problem in older adults. The number of persons 60 years or older with impaired visual acuity (defined as best corrected visual acuity worse than 20/40 but better than 20/200) was estimated at 2.91 million in 2015, and the number who are blind (defined as best corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or worse) was estimated at 760 000. Impaired visual acuity is consistently associated with decreased quality of life in older persons, including reduced ability to perform activities of daily living, work, and drive safely, as well as increased risk of falls and other unintentional injuries. Objective To update its 2016 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the benefits and harms of screening for impaired visual acuity in older adults. Population Asymptomatic adults 65 years or older who present in primary care without known impaired visual acuity and are not seeking care for vision problems. Evidence Assessment The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for impaired visual acuity in asymptomatic older adults. The evidence is lacking, and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined. More research is needed. Recommendation The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for impaired visual acuity in older adults. (I statement).

中文翻译:

老年人视力受损筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。

重要性 视力损害是老年人的一个严重公共卫生问题。2015 年,60 岁或以上视力受损(定义为最佳矫正视力低于 20/40 但优于 20/200)的人数估计为 291 万,而失明人数(定义为最佳矫正视力为 20/200 或更差)估计为 760 000。视力受损始终与老年人的生活质量下降相关,包括日常生活、工作和安全驾驶活动的能力下降,以及增加跌倒和其他意外伤害的风险。目标 更新其 2016 年建议,美国预防服务工作组 (USPSTF) 委托进行了一项系统评价,以评估筛查老年人视力受损的益处和危害。人群 65 岁或以上的无症状成年人,他们在初级保健中就诊,没有已知的视力受损,并且没有寻求视力问题的护理。证据评估 USPSTF 的结论是,证据不足以评估无症状老年人视力受损筛查的利弊平衡。证据不足,无法确定利弊平衡。需要更多的研究。建议 USPSTF 的结论是,目前的证据不足以评估老年人视力受损筛查的利弊平衡。(我声明)。人群 65 岁或以上的无症状成年人,他们在初级保健中就诊,没有已知的视力受损,并且没有寻求视力问题的护理。证据评估 USPSTF 的结论是,证据不足以评估无症状老年人视力受损筛查的利弊平衡。证据不足,无法确定利弊平衡。需要更多的研究。建议 USPSTF 的结论是,目前的证据不足以评估老年人视力受损筛查的利弊平衡。(我声明)。人群 65 岁或以上的无症状成年人,他们在初级保健中就诊,没有已知的视力受损,并且没有寻求视力问题的护理。证据评估 USPSTF 的结论是,证据不足以评估无症状老年人视力受损筛查的利弊平衡。证据不足,无法确定利弊平衡。需要更多的研究。建议 USPSTF 的结论是,目前的证据不足以评估老年人视力受损筛查的利弊平衡。(我声明)。证据评估 USPSTF 的结论是,证据不足以评估无症状老年人视力受损筛查的利弊平衡。证据不足,无法确定利弊平衡。需要更多的研究。建议 USPSTF 的结论是,目前的证据不足以评估老年人视力受损筛查的利弊平衡。(我声明)。证据评估 USPSTF 的结论是,证据不足以评估无症状老年人视力受损筛查的利弊平衡。证据不足,无法确定利弊平衡。需要更多的研究。建议 USPSTF 的结论是,目前的证据不足以评估老年人视力受损筛查的利弊平衡。(我声明)。建议 USPSTF 的结论是,目前的证据不足以评估老年人视力受损筛查的利弊平衡。(我声明)。建议 USPSTF 的结论是,目前的证据不足以评估老年人视力受损筛查的利弊平衡。(我声明)。
更新日期:2022-05-24
down
wechat
bug