ABSTRACT The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY, or the Tribunal) completed its mandate in 2017, marking the end of its 24-year lifespan. While the ICTY has officially ceased operations, the implications of the Tribunal’s closure continue to manifest in contemporary settings of transitional justice. Embracing a queer approach to time, the ICTY can be better understood as temporally fluid, open, and contested, rather than confined to its establishment and closure. This is because as a site for the (re)production and (re)presentation of discourses, the ICTY transcends temporal boundaries, continuing to shape and constitute (post-)conflict and transitional contexts. In this paper, I deploy queer approaches to time to interrogate how discourses of gender, sexuality, and violence at the ICTY traverse legal-political temporalities. Using the Tribunal’s Srebrenica remembrance as a case study, I demonstrate how gendered and sexualised logics constituted at the ICTY exceed the Tribunal’s official temporal mandate. Adopting a queer approach to time, I argue that gendered memories of violence at the ICTY permeate temporalities of international justice and global politics.

中文翻译：

---

国际刑事司法的奇怪时间：斯雷布雷尼察纪念和前南斯拉夫国际刑事法庭（ICTY）

摘要 前南斯拉夫问题国际刑事法庭（ICTY，或法庭）于 2017 年完成任务，标志着其 24 年寿命的结束。虽然前南问题国际法庭已正式停止运作，但法庭关闭的影响继续体现在当代过渡司法环境中。采用一种奇怪的时间方法，前南问题国际法庭可以更好地理解为时间流动、开放和有争议的，而不是局限于它的建立和关闭。这是因为作为话语（重新）生产和（重新）呈现的场所，前南国际刑事法庭超越了时间界限，继续塑造和构成（后）冲突和过渡背景。在这篇论文中，我采用酷儿的方法来审视关于性别、性、前南问题国际法庭的暴力和暴力跨越了法律-政治时间。以法庭的斯雷布雷尼察纪念案作为案例研究，我展示了前南问题国际法庭所构成的性别化和性化逻辑如何超出法庭的官方临时授权。采用一种奇怪的时间方法，我认为前南国际刑事法庭暴力的性别记忆渗透到国际正义和全球政治的时间性中。