One critical role counseling psychologists can play in dismantling anti-Blackness and eradicating systemic racism is to build on the field's strength in understanding individual-level processes (i.e., systems are created and maintained by individual actors). Drawing on antiracism scholarship, we aimed to better understand how colorblind racial ideology (CBRI), or the denial and minimization of race and racism, may serve as a barrier to engaging in antiracist praxis. Specifically, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine if color evasion (ignoring race) and power evasion (denying structural racism) CBRI were differentially associated with anti-Blackness and processes linked to antiracism. Findings based on 375 effects drawn from 83 studies with more than 25,000 individuals suggest different effects based on CBRI type. As hypothesized, we found that power evasion CBRI was related to increased endorsement of anti-Black prejudice (r = .33) and legitimizing ideologies (r = .24), and negatively associated with a range of other variables associated with antiracism, including social justice behaviors (r = -.31), multicultural practice competencies (r = -.16), diversity openness (r = -.28), and racial/ethnocultural empathy (r = -.35). Consistent with theory, color evasion CBRI was related to increased diversity openness (r = .12). We discuss limitations of our study, as well as outline future directions for research and practice to focus on the role of CBRI in sustaining and perpetuating anti-Blackness and systemic racism. Thus, this meta-analysis has implications for pushing the field of counseling psychology to build the bridge between individual ideologies and creating structural change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

忽视种族和否认种族主义：色盲种族意识形态、反黑人和其他与种族正义相对立的变量之间关联的元分析。

咨询心理学家在消除反黑人和根除系统性种族主义方面可以发挥的一个关键作用是加强该领域在理解个人层面过程（即系统由个体参与者创建和维护）方面的力量。借鉴反种族主义奖学金，我们旨在更好地理解色盲种族意识形态 (CBRI)，或否认和最小化种族和种族主义，如何成为参与反种族主义实践的障碍。具体来说，我们进行了一项荟萃分析，以确定逃避肤色（忽略种族）和逃避权力（否认结构性种族主义）CBRI 是否与反黑人和与反种族主义相关的过程有差异关联。基于来自 83 项研究的 375 项影响的调查结果，涉及超过 25,000 人，表明基于 CBRI 类型的不同影响。正如假设的那样，我们发现逃避权力的 CBRI 与反黑人偏见 (r = .33) 和意识形态合法化 (r = .24) 的支持增加有关，并且与反种族主义相关的一系列其他变量呈负相关，包括社会正义行为 ( r = -.31)、多元文化实践能力 (r = -.16)、多样性开放性 (r = -.28) 和种族/民族文化同理心 (r = -.35)。与理论一致，颜色逃避 CBRI 与增加的多样性开放性有关 (r = .12)。我们讨论了我们研究的局限性，并概述了研究和实践的未来方向，以关注 CBRI 在维持和延续反黑人和系统性种族主义方面的作用。因此，这种元分析对推动咨询心理学领域在个人意识形态和创造结构变革之间架起桥梁具有重要意义。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。