当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Articulating Populism in Place: A Relational Comparison of Kirchnerism in Argentina
Annals of the American Association of Geographers ( IF 3.2 ) Pub Date : 2022-05-20 , DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2022.2053652
Sam Halvorsen 1 , Fernanda Valeria Torres 2
Affiliation  

How are populist movements articulated in place, and what political tensions can arise when they mobilize across scales? Despite the historical significance of particular places for populist movements (e.g., countryside or city), much populist scholarship remains trapped in a national lens, and geographical analyses are only starting to take seriously place-based articulations. Drawing on Gillian Hart’s Gramscian approach, we understand articulation as a dual process of cojoining and resignifying that unfolds through geographically situated practices and language. We extend this by paying attention to actors of populist mobilization, political parties, and social movements, examining their articulation of political subjectivities and antagonisms through place-based contexts, thus providing an analytical framework for studying populism. Considering the national-popular movement of Kirchnerism, our analysis unfolds through a relational comparison of two contrasting places in Argentina—its wealthy capital city and the impoverished province of Jujuy—moving dialectically across different scales, considering contradictions between local and national mobilizations of Kircherism while also contextualizing these in regional and global process. In so doing, we demonstrate that a geographically sensitive analysis of populist conjunctures provides insights into the success and failures of national popular movements. Specifically, place-based movements face dilemmas between gaining support and autonomy from national counterparts, whereas national popular movements both depend on and are threatened by local populist success.



中文翻译:

明确表达民粹主义:阿根廷基什内尔主义的关系比较

民粹主义运动是如何到位的,当它们跨尺度动员时会出现什么政治紧张局势?尽管特定地点对民粹主义运动(例如农村或城市)具有历史意义,但许多民粹主义学术仍停留在国家视角,而地理分析才刚刚开始认真对待基于地点的表述。借鉴 Gillian Hart 的葛兰西方法,我们将表达理解为通过地理定位的实践和语言展开的联合和重新定义的双重过程。我们通过关注民粹主义动员、政党和社会运动的行为者来扩展这一点,通过基于地方的背景检查他们对政治主体性和对抗的表达,从而为研究民粹主义提供了一个分析框架。考虑到基什内尔主义的全国性流行运动,我们的分析通过对阿根廷两个截然不同的地方的关系比较展开——其富裕的首都和贫困的胡胡伊省——在不同的尺度上辩证地移动,考虑到地方和全国基什内尔主义动员之间的矛盾,而也在区域和全球进程中将这些背景化。通过这样做,我们证明了对民粹主义形势的地理敏感分析提供了对全国民众运动成功和失败的洞察。具体而言,基于地方的运动在获得国家同行的支持和自治之间面临两难境地,而全国性的民众运动既依赖于地方民粹主义的成功,也受到当地民粹主义成功的威胁。我们的分析通过对阿根廷两个截然不同的地方——富裕的首都和贫困的胡胡伊省——的关系比较展开,在不同的尺度上辩证地移动,考虑地方和国家动员基尔切主义之间的矛盾,同时也将这些矛盾置于区域和全球进程中。通过这样做,我们证明了对民粹主义形势的地理敏感分析提供了对全国民众运动成功和失败的洞察。具体而言,基于地方的运动在获得国家同行的支持和自治之间面临两难境地,而全国性的民众运动既依赖于地方民粹主义的成功,也受到当地民粹主义成功的威胁。我们的分析通过对阿根廷两个截然不同的地方——富裕的首都和贫困的胡胡伊省——的关系比较展开,在不同的尺度上辩证地移动,考虑地方和国家动员基尔切主义之间的矛盾,同时也将这些矛盾置于区域和全球进程中。通过这样做,我们证明了对民粹主义形势的地理敏感分析提供了对全国民众运动成功和失败的洞察。具体而言,基于地方的运动在获得国家同行的支持和自治之间面临两难境地,而全国性的民众运动既依赖于地方民粹主义的成功,也受到当地民粹主义成功的威胁。

更新日期:2022-05-20
down
wechat
bug