当前位置: X-MOL 学术Trauma, Violence, & Abuse › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Meta-Analysis of Cyber Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration and Victimization: Different Types and their Associations with Face-to-Tace IPV among Men and Women
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse ( IF 5.4 ) Pub Date : 2022-05-21 , DOI: 10.1177/15248380221082087
Ohad Gilbar 1 , Ruby Charak 2 , Oscar Trujillo 2 , Jorge I Cantu 2 , Valeria Cavazos 2 , Iris Lavi 3
Affiliation  

Cyber intimate partner violence (C-IPV) is a technology-mediated form of violence. It has been examined only in the last 10 years as a form of violence that can cause psychological damage to its victims. How this phenomenon connects to and differs from face-to-face IPV (F2F-IPV) has been, as yet, little studied. Research has not made clear whether sex differences may impact its use, particularly in light of the fact that no physical coercion is used in C-IPV. Thus, the current research aimed to investigate through a meta-analysis: differences between the average levels of different types of C-IPV victimization and perpetration; the association between C-IPV and F2F-IPV victimization and perpetration; and whether the answers to these questions were dependent on sex. The current meta-analysis drew on 46 studies, within 44 papers, with a total sample of 27,491 participants. Findings from 22 of these studies showed no significant sex differences between the average levels of different types of C-IPV victimization and between different types of C-IPV perpetration. These 22 studies showed positive large effect sizes for the correlation between C-IPV and F2F-IPV perpetration and victimization. Moreover, in both perpetration and victimization, sex did not impact the level of association. The findings suggested that C-IPV and F2F-IPV are highly correlated, and though not the same, they may share similar characteristics. Additionally, the results suggested that sex differences do not impact non-physical aggression, such as C-IPV. The implications for preventive strategies include that IPV interventions should also focus on alleviating instances of C-IPV.

中文翻译:

网络亲密伴侣暴力实施和受害的元分析:不同类型及其与男女面对面 IPV 的关联

网络亲密伴侣暴力 (C-IPV) 是一种以技术为媒介的暴力形式。直到最近 10 年,它才被作为一种可能对受害者造成心理伤害的暴力形式进行审查。这种现象如何与面对面的 IPV (F2F-IPV) 联系和区别,目前还鲜有研究。研究尚未明确性别差异是否会影响其使用,特别是考虑到 C-IPV 中不使用任何身体胁迫这一事实。因此,目前的研究旨在通过荟萃分析来调查: 不同类型的 C-IPV 受害和实施的平均水平之间的差异;C-IPV 和 F2F-IPV 受害和犯罪之间的关联;以及这些问题的答案是否取决于性别。目前的荟萃分析借鉴了 46 项研究,44 篇论文,共有 27,491 名参与者。其中 22 项研究的结果表明,不同类型的 C-IPV 受害的平均水平和不同类型的 C-IPV 犯罪之间没有显着的性别差异。这 22 项研究表明,C-IPV 和 F2F-IPV 犯罪和受害之间的相关性具有积极的大效应。此外,在犯罪和受害中,性别都不会影响关联程度。研究结果表明,C-IPV 和 F2F-IPV 高度相关,虽然不相同,但它们可能具有相似的特征。此外,结果表明性别差异不会影响非身体攻击,例如 C-IPV。对预防策略的影响包括 IPV 干预措施还应侧重于减轻 C-IPV 的情况。其中 22 项研究的结果表明,不同类型的 C-IPV 受害的平均水平和不同类型的 C-IPV 犯罪之间没有显着的性别差异。这 22 项研究表明,C-IPV 和 F2F-IPV 犯罪和受害之间的相关性具有积极的大效应。此外,在犯罪和受害中,性别都不会影响关联程度。研究结果表明,C-IPV 和 F2F-IPV 高度相关,虽然不相同,但它们可能具有相似的特征。此外,结果表明性别差异不会影响非身体攻击,例如 C-IPV。对预防策略的影响包括 IPV 干预措施还应侧重于减轻 C-IPV 的情况。其中 22 项研究的结果表明,不同类型的 C-IPV 受害的平均水平和不同类型的 C-IPV 犯罪之间没有显着的性别差异。这 22 项研究表明,C-IPV 和 F2F-IPV 犯罪和受害之间的相关性具有积极的大效应。此外,在犯罪和受害中,性别都不会影响关联程度。研究结果表明,C-IPV 和 F2F-IPV 高度相关,虽然不相同,但它们可能具有相似的特征。此外,结果表明性别差异不会影响非身体攻击,例如 C-IPV。对预防策略的影响包括 IPV 干预措施还应侧重于减轻 C-IPV 的情况。
更新日期:2022-05-22
down
wechat
bug