Abstract The article aims to show how interpreter trainers holistically grade student performances. For this purpose, experimental rating sessions were held for four undergraduate interpreter trainers. The raters were asked to think aloud their quality judgments while holistically assessing six recordings of consecutive interpretation. Their concurrent verbal reports, along with reflective reports, interview transcripts, and video recordings of computer screen activity, were collected and analysed in detail. Findings revealed various facets of interpreting performance assessment, including what procedures the raters followed, what aspects of the performance they focused on, what criteria they depended on for their judgment decisions, and why two ratings of the same performance were divergent. This article also presents a tentative model for holistic rating of consecutive interpretation.

中文翻译：

---

交替传译的整体评估

摘要 本文旨在展示口译培训师如何对学生的表演进行整体评分。为此，为四名本科口译培训师举办了实验评级会议。评估者被要求大声思考他们的质量判断，同时全面评估六次交替传译的录音。他们同时进行的口头报告以及反思报告、采访记录和电脑屏幕活动的视频记录都被收集和详细分析。调查结果揭示了解释绩效评估的各个方面，包括评估者遵循的程序，他们关注绩效的哪些方面，他们的判断决定依赖什么标准，以及为什么相同性能的两个评级是不同的。本文还提出了一个对交替传译进行整体评级的初步模型。