Abstract Dual process theories of decision making distinguish between type 1 processes, which are commonly assumed to be fast and autonomous and related to intuitive thinking, and type 2 processes, which require the involvement of working memory and are closely linked to analytical reasoning. The purpose of this work was to study the role of external information about intuitively made decisions, examining whether type 2 processes engagement is modified by exposure to positive or negative feedback. One hundred six participants completed a set of conditional reasoning tasks, adopting a two-response paradigm. Results showed that participants who expected to receive feedback information took longer to make intuitive decisions, but they took less time to give intuitive responses after the administration of positive feedback and more time after the administration of negative feedback; moreover, time spent by participants to provide their reflected responses progressively decreased throughout the experiment. A significant negative feedback effect also emerged, showing an increase in the accuracy of intuitive responses. Results are discussed from a dual process perspective.

中文翻译：

---

你是对的，你是错的：反馈对直觉思维的影响

摘要 决策制定的双重过程理论区分了第一类过程，通常被认为是快速和自主的，与直觉思维有关，第二类过程需要工作记忆的参与，与分析推理密切相关。这项工作的目的是研究外部信息对直观决策的作用，检查类型 2 流程参与是否因暴露于正面或负面反馈而改变。一百六名参与者完成了一组条件推理任务，采用了两种响应范式。结果表明，期望收到反馈信息的参与者需要更长的时间才能做出直观的决定，但他们在给予正面反馈后给出直观反应的时间更少，而在给予负面反馈后他们花费更多时间；此外，在整个实验过程中，参与者提供他们反映的反应所花费的时间逐渐减少。显着的负反馈效应也出现了，表明直觉反应的准确性有所提高。从双重过程的角度讨论结果。