Resolutions and other key documents adopted in the last few years by the international community provide that greater coherence and integration between law and policies on climate change adaptation (cca) and disaster risk reduction (drr) can lead to more efficient use of available resources, and more effective action in reducing human vulnerabilities and exposure to climate and disaster risks. Moving from the analytical background provided by the ‘informal international law’ theory (in-law), the purpose of this study is to evaluate how the combination of formal and informal law-making processes affects the coherent implementation of different normative instruments defining the current global agenda on climate risk governance. Normative developments in three different institutional contexts (the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – ‘Sendai system’; and the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement) will be assessed, in light of recent developments on the drafting, endorsement and implementation of relevant normative instruments. The analysis will be corroborated by references to the effects that greater synergies between these frameworks can generate at the regional and domestic levels, as demonstrated by evidence collected in three different countries (Fiji, the Philippines, and Dominica) between 2019 and 2021.

中文翻译：

---

通过正式和非正式的国际立法提高气候变化适应与减少灾害风险之间的一致性

国际社会在过去几年通过的决议和其他重要文件规定，气候变化适应方面的法律和政策之间要有更大的一致性和整合性（cca) 和减少灾害风险 (博士) 可以更有效地利用可用资源，并采取更有效的行动来减少人类的脆弱性和暴露于气候和灾害风险的风险。从“非正式国际法”理论提供的分析背景出发（在-法律)，本研究的目的是评估正式和非正式立法程序的结合如何影响定义当前全球气候风险治理议程的不同规范性文书的一致实施。三个不同机构背景下的规范发展（政府间气候变化专门委员会；联合国减少灾害风险办公室——“仙台系统”；国际红十字与红新月运动）将根据起草的最新进展进行评估、认可和实施相关规范性文书。分析将通过参考这些框架之间更大的协同作用可以在区域和国内层面产生的影响来证实，正如在三个不同国家（斐济、菲律宾、