The current research aimed to identify and prioritize the main dimensions underlying the concept of electronic readiness (e-readiness) in university libraries. A mixed exploratory method was used as the research methodology including documentary and survey methods. The literature coding process was confirmed by two different researchers in related fields, which resulted in a conceptual framework including 66 indicators, 12 components and four main dimensions of human resources, electronic infrastructures, networked programs and services, and enablers of the network world. To assess the indicators, a reliable and validated questionnaire derived from the framework was administrated among 221 participants including faculty members in related fields in Iran. By identifying the reliable items using a one-sample t-test, a refined AHP version of the initial questionnaire was also administrated among a set of 20 managers of university libraries located at Tehran city. Findings confirmed the consistency comparison for different matrices, which then resulted in satisfactory and reliable relevance for all components. Findings also showed that the dimensions network programs and services, human resources, electronic infrastructures and enablers of the networked world had the standard relevance respectively. The final framework and its priorities provide library managers and policymakers in higher education with a list of indicators and considerations for appraisal purposes.

中文翻译：

---

大学图书馆电子就绪的维度：使用 AHP 技术进行识别和优先排序

当前的研究旨在确定大学图书馆中电子就绪（e-readiness）概念背后的主要维度并对其进行优先排序。研究方法采用混合探索法，包括文献法和调查法。文献编码过程得到了相关领域的两位不同研究人员的证实，形成了一个概念框架，包括人力资源、电子基础设施、网络程序和服务以及网络世界的推动者的 66 个指标、12 个组成部分和四个主要维度。为了评估这些指标，在伊朗相关领域的教职员工在内的 221 名参与者中进行了一份源自该框架的可靠且经过验证的问卷调查。通过使用一个样本识别可靠的项目吨-test，在位于德黑兰市的大学图书馆的 20 名管理人员中，还对初始问卷的改进的 AHP 版本进行了管理。结果证实了不同矩阵的一致性比较，从而导致所有组件的相关性令人满意且可靠。调查结果还表明，网络项目和服务、人力资源、电子基础设施和网络世界的推动者维度分别具有标准相关性。最终框架及其优先事项为高等教育中的图书馆管理人员和政策制定者提供了一系列指标和考虑因素以供评估。