The replication crisis led to the rise of metascience as a possible solution. In this article, we examine central metascientific premises and argue that attempts to solve the replication crisis in psychology will benefit from a tighter integration of approaches from the psychological humanities. The first part of our article identifies central epistemic merits that metascientific endeavors can contribute to psychology. However, we argue secondly against the widespread claim that metascience is the only way to deal with the replication crisis in psychology and point to major epistemic problems: the one-sided notion of a singular scientific method, the homogenizing view of psychology, and the exclusion of practices of theorizing. As a possible compensation for such shortcomings, we introduce, third, the reflective and pluralistic approach of psychological humanities. In so doing, we show how psychological humanities can serve as an important complement to the objective of improving psychological research. Psychological humanities contribute to a more precise determination of validity, to ethical considerations, and a better understanding of psychology’s objects in regard to replication. Accordingly, we argue for the integration of psychological humanities into both metascience and psychology to provide a better basis for addressing epistemic and ethical questions.

复制危机导致元科学作为一种可能的解决方案兴起。在本文中，我们研究了元科学的中心前提，并认为解决心理学中的复制危机的尝试将受益于更紧密地整合心理学人文学科的方法。我们文章的第一部分确定了元科学的努力可以为心理学做出贡献的核心认知价值。然而，我们其次反对普遍认为元科学是处理心理学复制危机的唯一方法的说法，并指出主要的认识问题：单一科学方法的片面概念、心理学的同质化观点和排斥理论化的实践。作为对这些缺点的可能补偿，我们介绍，第三，心理学人文学科的反思和多元化方法。在此过程中，我们展示了心理学人文学科如何作为改进心理学研究目标的重要补充。心理学人文学科有助于更精确地确定有效性、伦理考虑，以及更好地理解心理学关于复制的对象。因此，我们主张将心理学人文学科整合到元科学和心理学中，以便为解决认知和伦理问题提供更好的基础。以及更好地理解心理学中关于复制的对象。因此，我们主张将心理学人文学科整合到元科学和心理学中，以便为解决认知和伦理问题提供更好的基础。以及更好地理解心理学中关于复制的对象。因此，我们主张将心理学人文学科整合到元科学和心理学中，以便为解决认知和伦理问题提供更好的基础。