While research shows that adult intimate partner violence (IPV) and harsh parenting of children co-occur, less information is available about whether specific types or patterns of IPV create greater risk for harsh parenting, and whether these patterns vary by gender. This study used latent class analysis (LCA) to examine unique patterns of IPV perpetration and victimization among men and women, and variation across patterns by gender, parenting status, and harsh parenting of children. Data are from the Lehigh Longitudinal study (n = 332). LCA produced four classes of IPV perpetration and victimization (Minor Psychological; None; Moderate; and Severe), which were invariant by gender. Although any level of IPV was associated with an increase in harsh parenting, patterns of IPV characterized by a greater number of and more severe types, were particularly associated with the use of harsh parenting toward their children for both mothers and fathers. Parents were overrepresented in all IPV classes compared to the No-IPV class. Results suggest the need for more broad screening and increased supports for parents that are tailored to different levels of need.

中文翻译：

---

亲密伴侣暴力的模式和孩子的严厉养育

虽然研究表明成人亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 和严酷的养育子女同时发生，但关于特定类型或模式的 IPV 是否会增加严酷养育的风险，以及这些模式是否因性别而异，目前尚不清楚。本研究使用潜在类别分析 (LCA) 来检查男性和女性中 IPV 实施和受害的独特模式，以及不同性别、育儿状况和严苛养育孩子的模式之间的差异。数据来自 Lehigh 纵向研究 ( n= 332)。LCA 产生了四类 IPV 实施和受害（轻微心理；无；中度；和严重），它们不因性别而异。尽管任何程度的 IPV 都与严厉养育的增加有关，但以更多和更严重类型为特征的 IPV 模式与父母对孩子的严厉养育特别相关。与无 IPV 班级相比，父母在所有 IPV 班级中的比例过高。结果表明，需要针对不同程度的需求进行更广泛的筛查并增加对父母的支持。