What does immigrant racialization look like in a context of legal inclusion? Although scholars have given notable attention to racialization in the face of illegality and exclusionary immigration regimes, less well understood are dimensions of racialization in inclusive legal contexts. Over the past decade, Brazil has experienced three major influxes of forcibly displaced people—from Haiti, Syria, and Venezuela. For each, Brazil radically expanded its asylum and immigration policies in their favor. At the same time, these groups have been disparately racialized in the public sphere. Using a content analysis of media coverage from 2010 to 2020, this paper examines the varied public racialization of Haitians, Syrians, and Venezuelans. Juxtaposing representations sheds light on the relationality of migrant racialization. It finds autonomy and capacity, belonging, and national ramification as key dimensions through which migrants are variably racialized. By interrogating these racial dimensions in the face of legal incorporation in Brazil, this study complicates the relationship between racialization, Othering, and legal status.

在法律包容的背景下，移民种族化是什么样子？尽管学者们在面对非法和排他性移民制度时对种族化给予了极大的关注，但人们对包容性法律背景下的种族化维度的了解却较少。在过去的十年里，巴西经历了来自海地、叙利亚和委内瑞拉的三大被迫流离失所者的涌入。对于每一个，巴西都从根本上扩大了对他们有利的庇护和移民政策。与此同时，这些群体在公共领域被不同程度地种族化。通过对 2010 年至 2020 年媒体报道的内容分析，本文研究了海地人、叙利亚人和委内瑞拉人的不同公共种族化。并列的陈述揭示了移民种族化的关系。它发现自治和能力、归属感和国家影响是移民被不同种族化的关键维度。通过在面对巴西的法律纳入时询问这些种族维度，本研究使种族化、他者化和法律地位之间的关系复杂化。