This is a response to Wang, Huang, and Frisina’s commentary on my book, The Good Is One, Its Manifestations Many. The response generally takes the form of re-emphasizing my peculiar stresses on the Confucian tradition while applauding their alternative stresses. I particularly emphasize my metaphysical claims to defend my support for Xunzi; I set my philosophy of religion in the context of East Asian, South Asian, and West Asian philosophies. First let me thank the three commentators for taking my book so seriously and writing such stimulating commentaries. I learned from them all: it is a good thing I did not see them before the book was published because they would have caused me to make the book much longer than it is to deal with their questions. I especially thank Yong Huang for organizing this panel. I apologize to all for being prevented from attending because of the weather. Permit me to respond to each of the comments.

中文翻译：

---

回应王、黄、弗里斯纳评论善为一，其表现多

这是对王、黄和弗里西纳对我的书《善为一，其表现形式多》的评论的回应。回应通常采取的形式是重新强调我对儒家传统的特殊强调，同时为他们的替代强调鼓掌。我特别强调我的形而上学主张，以捍卫我对荀子的支持；我将我的宗教哲学置于东亚、南亚和西亚哲学的背景下。首先让我感谢三位评论员如此认真地对待我的书并写出如此刺激的评论。我从他们身上学到了：在这本书出版之前我没有看到他们是一件好事，因为他们会让我把这本书写得比处理他们的问题要长得多。我特别感谢黄勇组织了这个小组。我向所有人道歉，因为天气原因无法参加。请允许我回复每条评论。