In science in general and in the context of single-case experimental designs, replication of the effects of the intervention within and/or across participants or experiments is crucial for establishing causality and for assessing the generality of the intervention effect. Specific developments and proposals for assessing whether an effect has been replicated or not (or to what extent) are scarce, in the general context of behavioral sciences, and practically null in the single-case experimental designs context. We propose an extension of the modified Brinley plot for assessing how many of the effects replicate. To make this assessment possible, a definition of replication is suggested, on the basis of expert judgment, rather than on statistical criteria. The definition of replication and its graphical representation are justified, presenting their strengths and limitations, and illustrated with real data. A user-friendly software is made available for obtaining automatically the graphical representation.

中文翻译：

---

评估单例实验设计中效果复制的建议

在一般科学和单例实验设计的背景下，在参与者或实验内部和/或之间复制干预效果对于确定因果关系和评估干预效果的普遍性至关重要。在行为科学的一般背景下，用于评估效果是否已被复制（或复制到何种程度）的具体发展和建议很少，而在单一案例实验设计背景下实际上是无效的。我们建议对修改后的布林利图进行扩展，以评估复制的效果数量。为了使这种评估成为可能，建议根据专家判断而不是统计标准来定义重复性。复制的定义及其图形表示是合理的，展示它们的优势和局限性，并用真实数据进行说明。一个用户友好的软件可用于自动获得图形表示。