当前位置: X-MOL 学术Business Ethics: A European Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A personalist approach to business ethics: New perspectives for virtue ethics and servant leadership
Business Ethics: A European Review Pub Date : 2022-04-18 , DOI: 10.1111/beer.12435
Germán Scalzo 1 , Kleio Akrivou 2 , Manuel Joaquín Fernández González 3
Affiliation  

This article has a twofold purpose: first, it explores how Leonardo Polo's personalist anthropology enriches and enhances neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics and second, it highlights how this specific personalist approach brings new perspectives to servant leadership. The recently revived neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics tradition finds that MacIntyre's scholarship significantly contributes to virtue ethics in business—particularly his conception of practices, institutions, and internal/external goods. However, we argue that some of his latest insights about the virtues of acknowledged dependence and human vulnerability remain underdeveloped because of the underlying anthropology that neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics relies on. To overcome this limitation, we introduce Polo's transcendental anthropology as a possible foundation of a personalist approach that enriches virtue ethics. To do so, we address how transcendental anthropology can enrich two central aspects of virtue ethics, namely (1) the understanding of human beings and their flourishing and (2) the relationship of virtue to praxis and human work. Finally, to address the practical implications for business leadership and work that can derive from assuming transcendental anthropology, we address how servant leadership acquires a new perspective in light of this personalism and its logic of gift, highlighting interpersonal self-giving as a way of service.

中文翻译:

商业道德的个人主义方法:美德道德和仆人式领导的新视角

本文有双重目的:首先,它探讨了列奥纳多·波罗的个人主义人类学如何丰富和增强新亚里士多德的美德伦理;其次,它强调了这种特定的个人主义方法如何为仆人式领导带来新的视角。最近复兴的新亚里士多德美德伦理学传统发现,麦金泰尔的学术成果对商业中的美德伦理学做出了重大贡献,特别是他对实践、制度和内部/外部商品的概念。然而,我们认为,由于新亚里士多德美德伦理学所依赖的人类学基础,他关于承认依赖和人类脆弱性的美德的一些最新见解仍然不发达。为了克服这个限制,我们介绍波罗的先验人类学,作为丰富美德伦理学的个人主义方法的可能基础。为此,我们探讨先验人类学如何丰富美德伦理学的两个核心方面,即(1)对人类及其繁荣的理解;(2)美德与实践和人类工作的关系。最后,为了解决先验人类学假设对企业领导力和工作的实际影响,我们讨论了仆人式领导力如何根据这种个人主义及其礼物逻辑获得新的视角,强调人际自我奉献作为一种服务方式。即(1)对人类及其繁荣的理解;(2)美德与实践和人类工作的关系。最后,为了解决先验人类学假设对企业领导力和工作的实际影响,我们讨论了仆人式领导力如何根据这种个人主义及其礼物逻辑获得新的视角,强调人际自我奉献作为一种服务方式。即(1)对人类及其繁荣的理解;(2)美德与实践和人类工作的关系。最后,为了解决先验人类学假设对企业领导力和工作的实际影响,我们讨论了仆人式领导力如何根据这种个人主义及其礼物逻辑获得新的视角,强调人际自我奉献作为一种服务方式。
更新日期:2022-04-18
down
wechat
bug