It is relatively unclear if underreporting (UR) detected by Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2–Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) L-r (Uncommon Virtues) and K-r (Adjustment Validity) scale scores generalizes to score distortion on criterion measures differently based on test-takers having scored highly on L-r, K-r, or both. Thus, this study reanalyzed the correctional sample of 632 men previously presented by Forbey and colleagues and defined UR groups as high scores on L-r alone (n = 89), K-r alone (n = 45), or both (n = 29). Groups were compared on selected MMPI-2-RF and criterion scales assessing internalizing, externalizing, and thought dysfunction difficulties using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc tests. Results suggested that UR generalized to score distortion on collateral measures, with K-r outperforming L-r in the prediction of this generalizability on all but measures of specific externalizing difficulties. However, having elevations on both L-r and K-r resulted in the strongest pattern of generalizability.

目前尚不清楚明尼苏达多相人格量表–2–重组表 (MMPI-2-RF) Lr（不常见美德）和 Kr（调整有效性）量表分数检测到的漏报（UR）是否概括为基于不同标准测量的分数失真在 Lr、Kr 或两者上得分很高的考生。因此，这项研究重新分析了 Forbey 及其同事之前提出的 632 名男性矫正样本，并将 UR 组定义为单独 Lr（n = 89）、单独 Kr（n = 45）或两者（n= 29). 使用方差分析 (ANOVA) 和事后检验，在选定的 MMPI-2-RF 和评估内化、外化和思维功能障碍困难的标准量表上比较各组。结果表明，UR 概括为在附带措施上得分失真，Kr 在预测这种普遍性方面优于 Lr，除了特定外化困难的措施。然而，在 Lr 和 Kr 上都有高程导致了最强的普遍性模式。