The open science movement introduced many research practices intended to enhance the rigor and trustworthiness of our science. While these practices are enticing, the breadth of tactics can be overwhelming and imply an all-or-nothing approach to open science that can discourage getting started. We cast the adoption of open science practices metaphorically: selecting which practice to use in a specific study is like visiting a buffet filled with an assortment of cuisines. The buffet will be best experienced over multiple visits where different cuisines are sampled (rather than selecting an overwhelming amount). We suggest that reflecting on widely shared core values of science—such as objectivity, honesty, openness, accountability, fairness, and stewardship—can help a scholar find their entry point in the buffet. We then share this buffet of open science practices, highlight exemplar cases in the literature where an open science practice has been enacted, and also bring attention to guidance for getting started. We close by challenging our readers to find one small win in open science to make our research more transparent, open, cumulative, and robust.

开放科学运动引入了许多旨在提高我们科学严谨性和可信度的研究实践。虽然这些做法很诱人，但策略的广度可能会让人不知所措，这意味着对开放科学采取全有或全无的方法可能会阻碍入门。我们比喻采用开放科学实践：选择在特定研究中使用哪种实践就像参观摆满各种美食的自助餐。自助餐将在多次访问时体验到最好的体验，其中不同的美食被采样（而不是选择压倒性的数量）。我们建议，反思广泛共享的科学核心价值观——例如客观、诚实、开放、问责、公平和管理——可以帮助学者在自助餐中找到他们的切入点。然后，我们分享开放科学实践的自助餐，重点介绍文献中实施开放科学实践的典型案例，并关注入门指南。最后，我们挑战读者在开放科学中找到一个小小的胜利，使我们的研究更加透明、开放、累积和稳健。