当前位置: X-MOL 学术Psychological Methods › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Reconsideration of the type I error rate for psychological science in the era of replication.
Psychological Methods ( IF 7.6 ) Pub Date : 2022-04-11 , DOI: 10.1037/met0000490
Michael T Carlin 1 , Mack S Costello 1 , Madisyn A Flansburg 1 , Alyssa Darden 1
Affiliation  

Careful consideration of the tradeoff between Type I and Type II error rates when designing experiments is critical for maximizing statistical decision accuracy. Typically, Type I error rates (e.g., .05) are significantly lower than Type II error rates (e.g., .20 for .80 power) in psychological science. Further, positive findings (true effects and Type I errors) are more likely to be the focus of replication. This conventional approach leads to very high rates of Type II error. Analyses show that increasing the Type I error rate to .10, thereby increasing power and decreasing the Type II error rate for each test, leads to higher overall rates of correct statistical decisions. This increase of Type I error rate is consistent with, and most beneficial in the context of, the replication and “New Statistics” movements in psychology.

中文翻译:


复制时代心理科学第一类错误率的再思考



设计实验时仔细考虑 I 型错误率和 II 型错误率之间的权衡对于最大化统计决策准确性至关重要。通常,在心理科学中,I 类错误率(例如,0.05)显着低于 II 类错误率(例如,0.80 幂为 0.20)。此外,积极的发现(真实效果和第一类错误)更有可能成为复制的焦点。这种传统方法导致 II 类错误发生率非常高。分析表明,将 I 类错误率提高到 0.10,从而提高功效并降低每次测试的 II 类错误率,从而提高正确统计决策的总体比率。 I 类错误率的增加与心理学中的复制和“新统计”运动是一致的,并且在其背景下是最有益的。
更新日期:2022-04-11
down
wechat
bug