[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported online in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology on Jun 02 2022 (see record 2022-66262-001). In the original article, the letter "M" in "M1" and "M2" throughout should not be italicized. The word "occurred" is corrected to "occurred" and the word "occurring" is corrected to "occurring" in several places throughout. The acronym LCS in Figure 1 note is corrected to latent change score model. The average immediate effect on life satisfaction that appears in the first sentence of the Cognitive Well-Being section is -4.74. The second sentence of the second paragraph in the Cognitive Well-Being section should appear as Luhman et al. (2014), for example, reported that life satisfaction dropped by 4.1 p.p. The third paragraph in the Cognitive Well-Being section should appear as Moreover, the effects can be compared to international panel studies. Variable names in Figures 2 and 3 notes should appear italicized. All versions of this article have been corrected.] While long-lasting declines in life satisfaction following unemployment have been well documented, evidence on the impact of unemployment on affective and eudaimonic well-being is scarce. Moreover, most existing studies relied on yearly panel data and were unable to separate the immediate effects of entering unemployment from prospective effects occurring before individuals become unemployed. The present study identified the immediate effects of entering unemployment on cognitive, affective and eudaimonic well-being facets using a control-group design based on monthly panel data of initially employed German jobseekers who were at high risk of losing their job. In order to investigate patterns of short-term adaptation, the study further examined whether average well-being levels change within the first months of unemployment using a mixed-effects trait-state-occasion model. All effects were separately computed for jobseekers affected by mass-layoffs or plant closures and individuals who registered as jobseekers due to other reasons. Multi-item instruments and experience sampling were used to validly measure the various well-being facets. The results indicate that life satisfaction and income satisfaction significantly decreased for individuals affected by mass-layoffs or plant closures from the last month in employment to the first month in unemployment. For individuals who registered as jobseekers due to other reasons, these effects were smaller and not significant in the case of life satisfaction. Crucially, there were no immediate effects of entering unemployment on the examined affective and eudaimonic well-being facets. Moreover, well-being levels were generally stable within the first months of unemployment indicating a general absence of short-term adaptation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

失业对认知、情感和幸福感方面的影响：调查即时影响和短期适应。

[更正通知：2022 年 6 月 2 日，《人格与社会心理学杂志》在线报道了这篇文章的勘误（见记录 2022-66262-001）。原文中，通篇“M1”和“M2”中的字母“M”不宜斜体。全文多处将“occurred”字样更正为“occurred”，将“occurring”字样更正为“occurring”。图 1 注释中的首字母缩略词 LCS 更正为潜在变化评分模型。认知幸福部分第一句中出现的对生活满意度的平均即时影响为 -4.74。认知幸福部分第二段的第二句应显示为 Luhman 等人。(2014)，例如，报告说生活满意度下降了 4.1 个百分点 认知幸福部分的第三段应该显示为此外，效果可以与国际小组研究进行比较。图 2 和图 3 注释中的变量名称应显示为斜体。本文的所有版本均已更正。] 虽然失业后生活满意度的长期下降已得到充分证明，但关于失业对情感和幸福感影响的证据却很少。此外，大多数现有研究依赖于年度面板数据，无法将进入失业的直接影响与个人失业前发生的预期影响区分开来。本研究确定了进入失业状态对认知、情感和幸福幸福方面使用控制组设计，该设计基于最初受雇的德国求职者的月度面板数据，这些求职者有很高的失业风险。为了调查短期适应模式，该研究使用混合效应特征-状态-场合模型进一步检查了平均幸福感水平是否在失业后的头几个月内发生变化。对受大规模裁员或工厂关闭影响的求职者以及因其他原因登记为求职者的个人，分别计算了所有影响。多项目工具和经验抽样被用来有效地测量各种幸福感方面。结果表明，从就业的最后一个月到失业的第一个月，受大规模裁员或工厂关闭影响的个人的生活满意度和收入满意度显着下降。对于因其他原因登记为求职者的个人，这些影响在生活满意度方面较小且不显着。至关重要的是，进入失业状态不会对所检查的情感和幸福感方面产生直接影响。此外，在失业后的头几个月内，幸福感水平总体稳定，表明普遍缺乏短期适应能力。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。在生活满意度的情况下，这些影响较小且不显着。至关重要的是，进入失业状态不会对所检查的情感和幸福感方面产生直接影响。此外，在失业后的头几个月内，幸福感水平总体稳定，表明普遍缺乏短期适应能力。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。在生活满意度的情况下，这些影响较小且不显着。至关重要的是，进入失业状态不会对所检查的情感和幸福感方面产生直接影响。此外，在失业后的头几个月内，幸福感水平总体稳定，表明普遍缺乏短期适应能力。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。