ABSTRACT

UN peacekeeping operations have introduced new data-based systems such as the Situational Awareness Geospatial Enterprise (SAGE) and the Comprehensive Planning and Performance Assessment System (CPAS). Simultaneously, UN leadership has repeatedly made the case that more women in peacekeeping will make peacekeeping more effective. We argue and show that these initiatives while occurring concurrently have been separate and that there is a lack of gender mainstreaming in the data-based approaches. We contend that this has negative consequences: It produces incomplete data regarding threats and needs of local beneficiaries and peacekeepers, it impedes performance assessment, and it leaves inefficiencies unaddressed.

摘要

联合国维和行动引入了新的基于数据的系统，例如态势感知地理空间企业（SAGE）和综合规划和绩效评估系统（CPAS）。同时，联合国领导层一再表明，更多的女性参与维和将使维和行动更加有效。我们争论并表明，这些举措在同时发生时是分开的，并且基于数据的方法中缺乏性别主流化。我们认为这会产生负面影响：它会产生有关当地受益者和维和人员的威胁和需求的不完整数据，阻碍绩效评估，并且效率低下没有得到解决。