In this article, I discuss parthood status in mereologically interpreted Daoist metaphysics, based on the Daodejing. I depart from the dao and you interrelation, which mereologically overlap by sharing parts. I consider the case of a complete overlap, which (a) challenges proper parthood, according to which a part cannot be identical with the whole that it composes, and (b) entails the question of identity that, while complying with classical mereology, cannot be consistent with Daoist metaphysics. The discussion leads to abandoning proper parthood and antisymmetry axiom from classical axiomatics. It also shows a plausible further direction for mereological reconstruction.

在这篇文章中，我根据道德经来讨论分体论解释道家形而上学的部分地位。我脱离了道和你的相互关系，它们通过共享部分在本质上重叠。我考虑完全重叠的情况，它（a）挑战适当的部分性，根据该部分性不能与其组成的整体相同，并且（b）包含身份问题，虽然符合经典的分体学，但不能符合道家玄学。讨论导致从经典公理学中放弃适当的部分性和反对称公理。它还为分子结构重建显示了一个合理的进一步方向。