In this article, combining the Confucian notion of relationality with the republican principle of non-domination, I will shed new light on the ethics of civil compliance in an emergency situation. More specifically, first, by exploring the culturally biased distinctions between individualism and collectivism in the current debates on ‘pandemic’ nationalism, I will put forward the need for a relationality through which civil cooperation with emergency governance can facilitate the enhancement of both individual freedom and democratic commonality in the long run. Then, by supplementing the moral vision of role-constituted relationality in Confucian role-ethics with the principle of liberty as non-domination in neo-Roman republicanism, I will suggest an ethics of civil compliance which can steer emergency governance toward the consolidation of democratic accountability.

在这篇文章中，我将结合儒家的关系观念和共和的非统治原则，对紧急情况下的民事顺从伦理进行新的阐释。更具体地说，首先，通过探讨当前关于“大流行”民族主义的辩论中个人主义和集体主义之间的文化偏见区别，我将提出一种关系的必要性，通过这种关系，民间合作与紧急治理可以促进个人自由和从长远来看，民主共性。然后，通过用新罗马共和主义中的非支配自由原则补充儒家角色伦理中的角色构成关系的道德观，