This essay contains a philosophical and literary letter on peace. The author has tried her best to support her points through argumentation by using analogies from philosophy, education, literature, mathematics, and so on. At the same time, to make the letter appealing, she has made up a fictional philosophical anecdote. The author has made an effort to make it interdisciplinary and, at the same time, easy to follow. Its main message is depoliticizing academic circles and decision making in such circles. The author has discussed how we can establish peace by adopting this approach. This issue is discussed through a literary letter, including a fictional philosophical anecdote, conveying love, empathy, and step-by-step interdisciplinary argumentation. The lexicon has been chosen meticulously to fit the Aristotle era. The term enemy, as directly mentioned at the end of the essay, does not have a geographical reference; rather, it refers to all biased decision-making figures. The author also provides a solution for unbiased decision making by academic circles by encouraging researchers to conduct a new line of research.

这篇文章包含一封关于和平的哲学和文学信件。作者通过哲学、教育、文学、数学等方面的类比，尽最大努力通过论证来支持她的观点。同时，为了让这封信更吸引人，她编造了一个虚构的哲学轶事。作者努力使其跨学科，同时易于理解。它的主要信息是去政治化学术圈和这些圈子的决策。作者已经讨论了我们如何通过采用这种方法来建立和平。这个问题通过一封文学信函进行讨论，包括虚构的哲学轶事、传达爱、同理心和逐步的跨学科论证。词典经过精心挑选，以适应亚里士多德时代。敌人一词，正如文章末尾直接提到的，没有地理参考；相反，它指的是所有有偏见的决策人物。作者还通过鼓励研究人员进行新的研究，为学术界的无偏见决​​策提供了解决方案。