Psychological science is at an inflection point: The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated inequalities that stem from our historically closed and exclusive culture. Meanwhile, reform efforts to change the future of our science are too narrow in focus to fully succeed. In this article, we call on psychological scientists—focusing specifically on those who use quantitative methods in the United States as one context for such conversations—to begin reimagining our discipline as fundamentally open and inclusive. First, we discuss whom our discipline was designed to serve and how this history produced the inequitable reward and support systems we see today. Second, we highlight how current institutional responses to address worsening inequalities are inadequate, as well as how our disciplinary perspective may both help and hinder our ability to craft effective solutions. Third, we take a hard look in the mirror at the disconnect between what we ostensibly value as a field and what we actually practice. Fourth and finally, we lead readers through a roadmap for reimagining psychological science in whatever roles and spaces they occupy, from an informal discussion group in a department to a formal strategic planning retreat at a scientific society.

心理科学正处于一个转折点：COVID-19 大流行加剧了源于我们历史上封闭和排外文化的不平等。同时，改变我们科学未来的改革努力的重点太窄，无法完全成功。在这篇文章中，我们呼吁心理学科学家——特别关注那些在美国使用定量方法作为此类对话的背景的人——开始将我们的学科重新构想为从根本上开放和包容。首先，我们讨论我们的学科旨在为谁服务，以及这段历史如何产生了我们今天看到的不公平的奖励和支持系统。其次，我们强调当前解决日益严重的不平等现象的机构反应是如何不足的，以及我们的学科观点如何帮助和阻碍我们制定有效解决方案的能力。第三，我们仔细审视镜子中我们表面上看重的领域与实际实践之间的脱节。第四，也是最后，我们引导读者通过路线图重新构想心理科学在他们占据的任何角色和空间，从部门的非正式讨论小组到科学社会的正式战略规划撤退。