OBJECTIVES American Indians and Alaska Natives (AIANs) experience significant disparities in their prevalence of suicidal ideation, attempts, and deaths when compared to all other racial/ethnic groups in the United States. In this systematic review (SR), we aim to examine the methodologies employed in AIAN suicide research during the past decade to highlight successful methodological practices and provide suggestions for improving future research. METHOD The authors followed guidance by Siddaway et al. (2019) for conducting SRs. The databases PsycINFO, Ovid Medline, The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Education Resources Information Center, Bibliography of Native North Americans, Sociological Abstracts, and Academic Search Premier were searched for scientific articles published between 2010 and June 5, 2020 that specifically focused on AIAN suicide. The search yielded 937 citations; 240 full-text articles were screened for inclusion, and 72 articles were included in this review. RESULTS Findings revealed significant heterogeneity among methodologies employed in the corpus, making it difficult to draw robust conclusions about AIAN suicide. Notably, research partnerships that were initiated by an AIAN Tribal Nation in collaboration with a research team yielded meaningful contributions and positive outcomes as compared to traditional community-based participatory research approaches. Finally, several critical gaps in the literature emerged including a lack of data on sexual and gender minority AIANs, urban, and multiracial AIANs. CONCLUSIONS Based on these findings, we propose the following recommendations: (a) standardize the assessment of suicide; (b) increase partnerships between Tribal Nations and researchers; and (c) pursue research centering specific high-risk populations (e.g., urban, sexual and gender minority, and multiracial AIANs). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

对 2010 年至 2020 年美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民自杀研究方法的系统回顾。

目标 与美国所有其他种族/族裔群体相比，美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民 (AIAN) 在自杀意念、自杀企图和死亡发生率方面存在显着差异。在本次系统评价（SR）中，我们旨在研究过去十年 AIAN 自杀研究中采用的方法，以突出成功的方法实践，并为改进未来的研究提供建议。方法 作者遵循 Siddaway 等人的指导。(2019) 进行 SR。检索了 PsycINFO、Ovid Medline、护理和联合健康文献累积索引 (CINAHL)、教育资源信息中心、北美原住民书目、社会学摘要和学术搜索 Premier 等数据库，查找 2010 年至 6 月 5 日期间发表的科学文章，2020 年特别关注 AIAN 自杀事件。搜索结果被引用 937 次；筛选纳入全文240篇，本次综述纳入72篇。结果 调查结果显示，语料库中采用的方法之间存在显着的异质性，因此很难就 AIAN 自杀得出可靠的结论。值得注意的是，与传统的基于社区的参与性研究方法相比，由 AIAN 部落民族与研究团队合作发起的研究伙伴关系产生了有意义的贡献和积极成果。最后，文献中出现了一些关键差距，包括缺乏性少数和性别少数 AIAN、城市和多种族 AIAN 的数据。结论 根据这些发现，我们提出以下建议：(a) 标准化自杀评估；(b) 加强部落民族与研究人员之间的伙伴关系；(c) 开展以特定高风险人群为中心的研究（例如城市人群、性少数群体以及多种族 AIAN）。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。